1moretimeagain
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 3,220
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bless your concrete thinking little heartNo. The picture with redacted faces. The one you referred to as:
"Photos of Trump snuggling up with females whose faces are redacted suggests that those are the victims as young teens now seeking justice, but maybe not. Maybe those females were 35 yo adults that the redactions are intended to protect."
Did you already forget?
They might if we can get Stormy to come in and properly identify the stubby mushroom she's familiar with.sex acts are actually depicted ?
If so, do they really prove anything ?
On the Epstein Files themselves:
“… Ms. Wiles said she has read the Epstein documents and acknowledged that Mr. Trump’s name is in them.
“We know he’s in the file,” she said.
“And he’s not in the file doing anything awful.”
But neither, apparently, is Mr. Clinton. Asked about Mr. Trump’s claims going back years that Mr. Clinton had visited the Epstein island, Ms. Wiles said, “There is no evidence.”
Asked if there was anything incriminating about Mr. Clinton in the files, as Mr. Trump has suggested, she said, “The president was wrong about that.”
She added that it was Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s idea to go interview Mr. Epstein’s convicted associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, in prison and that the president did not know that she would be transferred to a minimum-security prison camp.
“The president was ticked,” she said.
“The president was mighty unhappy. I don’t know why they moved her. Neither does the president.”…”
In a normal White House it would’ve already happened soon after this story hit. With Trump, who knows?So will the White House Chief of Staff be shown the door before or after Christmas ?
She may have some security in being the only one who can hold the raft of misfits together and keep them from drowning in their own neuroses/incompetence.In a normal White House it would’ve already happened soon after this story hit. With Trump, who knows?
On the Epstein Files themselves:
“… Ms. Wiles said she has read the Epstein documents and acknowledged that Mr. Trump’s name is in them.
“We know he’s in the file,” she said.
“And he’s not in the file doing anything awful.”
But neither, apparently, is Mr. Clinton. Asked about Mr. Trump’s claims going back years that Mr. Clinton had visited the Epstein island, Ms. Wiles said, “There is no evidence.”
Asked if there was anything incriminating about Mr. Clinton in the files, as Mr. Trump has suggested, she said, “The president was wrong about that.”
She added that it was Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s idea to go interview Mr. Epstein’s convicted associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, in prison and that the president did not know that she would be transferred to a minimum-security prison camp.
“The president was ticked,” she said.
“The president was mighty unhappy. I don’t know why they moved her. Neither does the president.”…”
On the Epstein Files themselves:
“… Ms. Wiles said she has read the Epstein documents and acknowledged that Mr. Trump’s name is in them.
“We know he’s in the file,” she said.
“And he’s not in the file doing anything awful.”
But neither, apparently, is Mr. Clinton. Asked about Mr. Trump’s claims going back years that Mr. Clinton had visited the Epstein island, Ms. Wiles said, “There is no evidence.”
Asked if there was anything incriminating about Mr. Clinton in the files, as Mr. Trump has suggested, she said, “The president was wrong about that.”
She added that it was Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s idea to go interview Mr. Epstein’s convicted associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, in prison and that the president did not know that she would be transferred to a minimum-security prison camp.
“The president was ticked,” she said.
“The president was mighty unhappy. I don’t know why they moved her. Neither does the president.”…”