Epstein Files | Patel: Trust us

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 566
  • Views: 14K
  • Politics 
theel4life said:
He is protecting child molesters.
Click to expand...
Look at his forehead, where I grew up we call that thing a fivehead. Dude can probably mount an 85 inch flatscreen on that thing. He probably is a child molester himself because no grown woman with any standards would come within 50 yards of him naked.
 
altmin said:
THe cult has moved on. Teflon Don skates again.

so-the-cult-was-and-still-is-ok-with-dear-leader-protecting-v0-71w6hsn3gzcf1.webpso-the-cult-was-and-still-is-ok-with-dear-leader-protecting-v0-r6o4cxz3gzcf1.webpso-the-cult-was-and-still-is-ok-with-dear-leader-protecting-v0-il1vppw4gzcf1.webpso-the-cult-was-and-still-is-ok-with-dear-leader-protecting-v0-ncomz0b5gzcf1.webpso-the-cult-was-and-still-is-ok-with-dear-leader-protecting-v0-jcdnwmm5gzcf1.webpso-the-cult-was-and-still-is-ok-with-dear-leader-protecting-v0-rezq37w5gzcf1.webpso-the-cult-was-and-still-is-ok-with-dear-leader-protecting-v0-gqhmkf56gzcf1.webp
Click to expand...
I would not necessarily put much stock into what a bunch of paid right wing social media shills/influencers are saying. They’ve got their talking points and marching orders, and they are paid handsomely – probably by the Kremlin since we all know that Trump is a broke ass bitch. If you’re going to put stock into anything online, I would put more stock into the fact that literally tens of thousands of actual rank and file MAGAts bombarded Trump’s “stop talking about Epstein” post on Truth Social. That obviously does not mean that this is going to be the thing that brings down Trump and it obviously does not mean that eventually the base won’t resume their position down on their knees, but it’s at least a better revelation of how big of a problem this is causing in the MAGA base at large, than by looking at the people like Charlie Kirk who are paid to perform daily fellatio on Trump.
 
Ultimately, I have zero expectation , and really zero care, as to whether this Epstein cover-up scandal mortally wounds Trump‘s presidency. I don’t think anyone should have any expectation that it will do much to damage Trump personally or politically, but it is nice to have the validation that, yes, the suspicion that Trump was directly involved in Epstein‘s sex trafficking of minors was correct all along, and it’s also nice to know that it is clearly causing him personal stress and discomfort. But the real cherry on top is the fact that it has the real potential to fatally splinter the MAGA base. That’s the real victory in all of this – not that Trump is going to suffer one iota politically, but rather that the Republican Party as a whole stands to suffer very significantly politically down ballot in 2026 and 2028.

Now, granted, it’s going to require the Democrats to actually grow a pair and learn how to hit the GOP where it hurts the most, but even as dysfunctional as they are, I have confidence that even the Democratic Party can’t fuck up the gift it is currently being handed on a silver platter in Trump covering up the Epstein stuff combined with the fact that the economy is headed for a potentially significant downturn over the next 18 months.

Edited to add: the added bonus is that we get to make fun of the board MAGAts for being supporters and enablers of a child diddler. That’s not to diminish or minimize the pain and trauma suffered by Epstein‘s victims, for whom I feel deep sadness and sorrow.
 
If I had a dollar for every GQPer/MAGA cuck prostrating before before Trump since he took office, I would be even richer than I am 😎
 
Speaking of cucks, is it just me or have we not heard from Ben Shapiro lately? Did Stephen Miller finally figure out he’s a Jew and send him to alligator Alcatraz?
 
CFordUNC said:
Ultimately, I have zero expectation , and really zero care, as to whether this Epstein cover-up scandal mortally wounds Trump‘s presidency. I don’t think anyone should have any expectation that it will do much to damage Trump personally or politically, but it is nice to have the validation that, yes, the suspicion that Trump was directly involved in Epstein‘s sex trafficking of minors was correct all along, and it’s also nice to know that it is clearly causing him personal stress and discomfort. But the real cherry on top is the fact that it has the real potential to fatally splinter the MAGA base. That’s the real victory in all of this – not that Trump is going to suffer one iota politically, but rather that the Republican Party as a whole stands to suffer very significantly politically down ballot in 2026 and 2028.

Now, granted, it’s going to require the Democrats to actually grow a pair and learn how to hit the GOP where it hurts the most, but even as dysfunctional as they are, I have confidence that even the Democratic Party can’t fuck up the gift it is currently being handed on a silver platter in Trump covering up the Epstein stuff combined with the fact that the economy is headed for a potentially significant downturn over the next 18 months.

Edited to add: the added bonus is that we get to make fun of the board MAGAts for being supporters and enablers of a child diddler. That’s not to diminish or minimize the pain and trauma suffered by Epstein‘s victims, for whom I feel deep sadness and sorrow.
Click to expand...
1000%. I have no doubt whatsoever that an enormous number of powerful people, from every point along the political spectrum, used Epstein to give them access to all manner of deplorable, immoral conduct. There's not a single politician or major cultural figure in the last 40 years who would shock me if he shows up in the Epstein records.

The only relevance to any of this is that THE CURRENT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, MAGA DEITY, COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF THE GREATEST MILITARY EVER ASSEMBLED, AND PUTATIVE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD is unwilling to be transparent about these records. Generally, logic does not allow the conclusion of X from things that are contrary to X. But this one is pretty binary. If this particular administration, which will support baseless conspiracy theories at the drop of a hat, is unwilling to share information about X, then the only logical assumption is that X is extraordinarily harmful to said administration.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top