Epstein Files | They’ve released wild claims

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 5K
  • Views: 174K
  • Politics 
CarolinaFever said:
How much more definitive do you need? Do you need video of him having sex with a kid to believe it?
Click to expand...
Maybe Prince Andrew level evidence. So that is accusations by a victim corroborated by other witnesses and/or written records. In Prince Andrew's case there were a couple of witnesses plus some flight records and photographs that corroborated Guthrie's story. That's not a conviction but that's stronger evidence than some of these documents that mention or might mention Trump.
 
Massie and Khana were able to view unredacted portions of the files, in lieu of letting all of Congress to view. By law, we are all supposed to be able to view. Amazing obvious coverup by DOJ.....

Key Facts​

Massie said what bothered him the most about his viewing was “the names of at least six men that have been redacted that are likely incriminated by their inclusion in these files.”
Khanna noted that despite the Justice Department confirming last week that members of Congress could read the unredacted Epstein files, “There's still a lot that's redacted.”
Massie did not provide the names of the individuals he and Khanna saw, but said one was a U.S. citizen and another was an authoritative figure in a foreign government, while Khanna noted one name belonged to a high-profile individual.

 
lightbluenc said:
She wasn’t Jane Doe to the defendant.
Click to expand...
Oops. I did some digging on this mysterious case and it turns out she wasn't actually anonymous. She initially filed it under her own name. It is out there on the internet for anyone to find but I won't repeat it.

The plaintiff dropped that and then a California patent lawyer (yes, patent lawyer) refiled in California. That was dropped so then a different patent attorney refiled in New York but dropped it a few months later.

Interestingly, the lawsuit and subsequent dismissal is mentioned in the Epstein emails.

But to say that the media never pursued this story in the months leading up to a contentious election or the decade since is hard to believe.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
Oops. I did some digging on this mysterious case and it turns out she wasn't actually anonymous. She initially filed it under her own name. It is out there on the internet for anyone to find but I won't repeat it.

The plaintiff dropped that and then a California patent lawyer (yes, patent lawyer) refiled in California. That was dropped so then a different patent attorney refiled in New York but dropped it a few months later.

Interestingly, the lawsuit and subsequent dismissal is mentioned in the Epstein emails.

But to say that the media never pursued this story in the months leading up to a contentious election or the decade since is hard to believe.
Click to expand...
Dude. Nearly 30 women have accused Trump of sexual abuse and rape. People like you who don't pay attention, or those who straight up dismiss the evidence, or believe that he has changed (i.e. found Jesus), are the problem.

Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
 
zeuxis said:
Dude. Nearly 30 women have accused Trump of sexual abuse and rape. People like you who don't pay attention, or those who straight up dismiss the evidence, or believe that he has changed (i.e. found Jesus), are the problem.

Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...
I believe Jean Carrol was sexually assaulted. I think Harth's allegations of sexual assault sounded credible. Those are the two most credible to me.

It seems like Trump's MO is to aggressively kiss and grope adult women he likes and then back-off if they push back. I believe that. But I also think that is a far cry from gang raping a kid with Epstein. Anything is possible but I just don't believe there's much evidence for it.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
Maybe Prince Andrew level evidence. So that is accusations by a victim corroborated by other witnesses and/or written records. In Prince Andrew's case there were a couple of witnesses plus some flight records and photographs that corroborated Guthrie's story. That's not a conviction but that's stronger evidence than some of these documents that mention or might mention Trump.
Click to expand...
Trump has been charged more... he just knows how to cover his tracks better because he has more experience.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
I believe Jean Carrol was sexually assaulted. I think Harth's allegations of sexual assault sounded credible. Those are the two most credible to me.

It seems like Trump's MO is to aggressively kiss and grope adult women he likes and then back-off if they push back. I believe that. But I also think that is a far cry from gang raping a kid with Epstein. Anything is possible but I just don't believe there's much evidence for it.
Click to expand...
You think he would draw the line a young girls, but walk in on naked under age girls at his under age pageant and be besties with a notorious pimp of of underaged girls... whose client base was solely comprised of people just like Trump.

And he has numerous charges of doing this.

I just don't know why you play this game... just say you either don't wanna believe it about your guy or you're OK with him doing it? I'm not saying that that's something that you would do but you're OK with him doing it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top