WaynetheDrain
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 1,199
It’s so weird that the right to life freaks prove time and time again that they literally stop caring about that life the second it’s out of the womb.Or…just hire a nanny or AU pair.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s so weird that the right to life freaks prove time and time again that they literally stop caring about that life the second it’s out of the womb.Or…just hire a nanny or AU pair.![]()
yeah and the situation had fuckall to do with childcare anyway.Well, Ram is one of those rich Buckhead lawyers...
What would you do with a pair of American University students?Or…just hire a nanny or AU pair.![]()
Why do you hate parents and their children so much? Why do you hate this country?Or…just hire a nanny or AU pair.![]()
You’re not nearly as clever as you think you are. You’re like ZenMode on the funnies thread.Or…just hire a nanny or AU pair.![]()
She also needs to do what Margaret Thatcher did with her voice - learn to speak in lower tones AND absolutely no high-pitched laughter.This era is so anti-incumbency that a White, Christian, straight woman potentially could win as long as she isn't attractive but also not too ugly, and strong but not "nasty"... And her running mate is all the above but male... But the economy would need to suck.
Don't see where he spent time abroad while his infant was in trouble ...Guess that’s why he spent time abroad promoting the film he was in.
Pro birth, not pro life...It’s so weird that the right to life freaks prove time and time again that they literally stop caring about that life the second it’s out of the womb.
You've already provided a lot of insight into your relative disdain for the rule of law and the Constitution. Shall we add disdain for your own children to that list?Or…just hire a nanny or AU pair.![]()
This^Occasionally, I have to be "that guy," so I will be that guy.
It still shocks me how many of you attempt to have dialogue with these bad faith, degenerate assholes. I'm convinced you just like seeing your thoughts in digital print. Or hearing the sound of your own voice, or something.
For as much as we criticize Democratic Party messaging here, many of you make the same mistakes. You don't converse with fascists and bad faith actors. You just legitimize them in the process. You talk to them. Because the alternative to "talk" is potentially war, which only the very worst among us want. But you do not converse. If you understand the distinction.
So you don't meet them on their terms, which is conversation. You throw them off balance. You ask why they hate the country. You ask why they hate children. You ask why they hate prosperity. You ask why they hate the Constitution. Etc. You don't debate them on the merits of their arguments. They'll garble back some nonsense. And as long as we still have a court of public opinion in this country, it will be the judge. If they decide some complete nonsense about how the Constitution "actually allows us to do whatever the fuck we want" great, then so be it. But you don't play on their terms.
People are emotional. Facts don't matter. So you use what you have to turn emotion on your side. To appeal to that lizard brain receptor. You don't have to appeal to the mom in suburban Philadelphia who is worried about illegal migrant hordes raping her children. She's an idiot. She's gone. But you show the rest of available swing voters how our most basic national values are under attack by allowing the opposition to be the complete unhinged assholes they are. And once the economy tanks like a stone dropped into a lake, as it surely will, you capitalize.
I have a different perspective when it comes to engaging with posters like Silence and Ram. ..Occasionally, I have to be "that guy," so I will be that guy.
It still shocks me how many of you attempt to have dialogue with these bad faith, degenerate assholes. I'm convinced you just like seeing your thoughts in digital print. Or hearing the sound of your own voice, or something.
For as much as we criticize Democratic Party messaging here, many of you make the same mistakes. You don't converse with fascists and bad faith actors. You just legitimize them in the process. You talk to them. Because the alternative to "talk" is potentially war, which only the very worst among us want. But you do not converse. If you understand the distinction.
So you don't meet them on their terms, which is conversation. You throw them off balance. You ask why they hate the country. You ask why they hate children. You ask why they hate prosperity. You ask why they hate the Constitution. Etc. You don't debate them on the merits of their arguments. They'll garble back some nonsense. And as long as we still have a court of public opinion in this country, it will be the judge. If they decide some complete nonsense about how the Constitution "actually allows us to do whatever the fuck we want" great, then so be it. But you don't play on their terms.
People are emotional. Facts don't matter. So you use what you have to turn emotion on your side. To appeal to that lizard brain receptor. You don't have to appeal to the mom in suburban Philadelphia who is worried about illegal migrant hordes raping her children. She's an idiot. She's gone. But you show the rest of available swing voters how our most basic national values are under attack by allowing the opposition to be the complete unhinged assholes they are. And once the economy tanks like a stone dropped into a lake, as it surely will, you capitalize.
This is also a good take.I have a different perspective when it comes to engaging with posters like Silence and Ram. ..
First, they contribute to the board by sharing the latest views and "news" emanating from the ooze in the right wing fever swamp
Second, it provides an opportunity to correct the record with the actual facts
Third, there may be some lurkers who may be duped and influenced by the misinformation being spread. Confronting the misinformation may help some lurkers avoid being duped.
Sometimes you have to set them up to knock them down. "You catch more flies with sugar..."This is also a good take.
I guess I just don’t have the patience.
However, if you do engage with them, I’d like it better if you “talk at them” like Mendo suggests instead of trying to engage them in some semblance of a decent conversation… which in itself sort of lends a bit of credibility to their side. Instead, I’d rather see someone give them a good solid beat down of a talking to, the way Manhattanheel used to do to the dookies on the old IC basketball board back in the day.
But like I say, I just don’t have the time, energy or inclination to engage with idiocy like that. Even if giving them a good lashing.
Always true. I’m just old and impatient and no energy to engage with the idiots. However I do like it when you guys will take them down a peg or two with clear, factual, persuasive arguments for the good side. But I like it even better when somebody does it with a solid tongue lashing that leaves marks on em.Sometimes you have to set them up to knock them down. "You catch more flies with sugar..."
The risk if you pull their pants down and give 'em a good spanking is that they will run away and then I lose my source for becoming aware of the latest "news" from earth 2.Always true. I’m just old and impatient and no energy to engage with the idiots. However I do like it when you guys will take them down a peg or two with clear, factual, persuasive arguments for the good side. But I like it even better when somebody does it with a solid tongue lashing that leaves marks on em.