superrific
Legend of ZZL
- Messages
- 7,225
I've been thinking about this a bunch recently but didn't want to post anything for fear of jinxing myself. LOL. No jinx required.
1. Family court is an abomination. Today I managed to lose my custody case, seeking to get custody over my twins because my ex- refuses to get adequate treatment for the one who regularly assaults girls and animals at school. The reason given by the court? You can't make this up: I asked my wife for advice about medicating my son. My wife the child psychiatrist who has treated thousands of autistic kids over her 20 year career. In fact, my wife is the leading child psych in the area, and indeed she caught a medication error by the resident to whom my ex- occasionally takes me son to prove to the court that she's seeking treatment for him (though she lies).
In general, the judge blamed my wife for everything, and said that the kids should be parented by the parents, not the step-mom. Almost always, the complaint about spouses in a custody situation is that they distract one of the parents from parenting with their conjugal needs. The idea that it's a problem that the step-mom takes an interest in the children -- keeping in mind that she has been assaulted by my son and threatened with a knife twice -- is so ludicrous that I can't believe I just heard it. Obviously I couldn't have ever won this case because I was unaware of the principle that step-moms are bad. The judge said that I was not fit to be obtaining treatment for him because I'm not interested in the doctors' thoughts, that I'm only interested in boosting my wife. Not only is that untrue (and supported by precisely nothing in the record), but seriously? It is a bad thing for me to consult a child psychiatrist when thinking about my son's psychiatric problems?
2. There's now no question in my mind that the family court is biased against men. I've always discounted that idea; every person who loses a case finds some reason that the judge was anti-them. But this ruling is so loco that obviously the judge found the outcome she wanted and went with it. She called my ex-wife's testimony "credible" though it was contradicted by documents, by her own statements, and the testimony of our eldest son. I mean, I've been through this twice now and the judges have been absolutely nuts, just making up facts. It wasn't a slam dunk case for me; the judge could have held for my ex-wife by saying that I didn't carry my burden of proof. But instead she made a number of accusations against me, at my person, based on nothing. Literally nothing.
3. When we talk about men being disaffected and falling behind, I don't think family court gets enough attention. It is an incredibly alienating process. For one thing, it shouldn't be a judicial proceeding. You shouldn't need to pay $30K+ to settle a custody dispute (or in my previous case, 100K). You shouldn't need stupid shit like authenticating evidence from the school. The hearsay evidence rule needs to be relaxed, given that hearsay is literally the only way to get into evidence some of the most important information -- i.e. the children's own experience. But no, we do family court because shitty lawyers need jobs.
And at least where I live, it's super-biased against men. So men are told to be fathers; but when we try to be fathers, we are told to shove off. My kids desperately want more time with me, because I care about their problems and they look to me for guidance and I nurture their abilities. I get six overnights every four weeks, plus 2 hour visits on Wednesdays.
4. I bet this is a pretty sizeable factor in men feeling as though the government is out to get them. Because, on this issue, it kind of is. And there's no question that it's the liberals who are driving this, and in particular liberal women.
And perhaps most importantly, it's not only the litigants! It's the kids. My eldest son called the judge a bitch when he learned of the outcome. He was pissed off that the first judge didn't listen to him or give his views any credence; now that the next judge decided to swallow a pack of lies from his mom and disregard his testimony, he's decided that judges are full of shit. Hey great job, liberals!
My twins are going to be really pissed that they can't spend more time with me. And whose fault will it be? It is, in fact, the judge's fault. And my kids are growing up, seeing that men and fathers are being devalued and they will get the message. My eldest -- I have completely confidence in him, and he wouldn't let his experience here leech out into his other views. But my twins? I don't know.
5. This is an issue that liberals need to fix. But they won't, because there are too many mouths being fed by the current system. If Trump just feels a need to destroy things, family court would have been a much better target. It needs disruption in the worst way. (Of course, I would not trust Trump to find a replacement and yes I know it's a state issue).
1. Family court is an abomination. Today I managed to lose my custody case, seeking to get custody over my twins because my ex- refuses to get adequate treatment for the one who regularly assaults girls and animals at school. The reason given by the court? You can't make this up: I asked my wife for advice about medicating my son. My wife the child psychiatrist who has treated thousands of autistic kids over her 20 year career. In fact, my wife is the leading child psych in the area, and indeed she caught a medication error by the resident to whom my ex- occasionally takes me son to prove to the court that she's seeking treatment for him (though she lies).
In general, the judge blamed my wife for everything, and said that the kids should be parented by the parents, not the step-mom. Almost always, the complaint about spouses in a custody situation is that they distract one of the parents from parenting with their conjugal needs. The idea that it's a problem that the step-mom takes an interest in the children -- keeping in mind that she has been assaulted by my son and threatened with a knife twice -- is so ludicrous that I can't believe I just heard it. Obviously I couldn't have ever won this case because I was unaware of the principle that step-moms are bad. The judge said that I was not fit to be obtaining treatment for him because I'm not interested in the doctors' thoughts, that I'm only interested in boosting my wife. Not only is that untrue (and supported by precisely nothing in the record), but seriously? It is a bad thing for me to consult a child psychiatrist when thinking about my son's psychiatric problems?
2. There's now no question in my mind that the family court is biased against men. I've always discounted that idea; every person who loses a case finds some reason that the judge was anti-them. But this ruling is so loco that obviously the judge found the outcome she wanted and went with it. She called my ex-wife's testimony "credible" though it was contradicted by documents, by her own statements, and the testimony of our eldest son. I mean, I've been through this twice now and the judges have been absolutely nuts, just making up facts. It wasn't a slam dunk case for me; the judge could have held for my ex-wife by saying that I didn't carry my burden of proof. But instead she made a number of accusations against me, at my person, based on nothing. Literally nothing.
3. When we talk about men being disaffected and falling behind, I don't think family court gets enough attention. It is an incredibly alienating process. For one thing, it shouldn't be a judicial proceeding. You shouldn't need to pay $30K+ to settle a custody dispute (or in my previous case, 100K). You shouldn't need stupid shit like authenticating evidence from the school. The hearsay evidence rule needs to be relaxed, given that hearsay is literally the only way to get into evidence some of the most important information -- i.e. the children's own experience. But no, we do family court because shitty lawyers need jobs.
And at least where I live, it's super-biased against men. So men are told to be fathers; but when we try to be fathers, we are told to shove off. My kids desperately want more time with me, because I care about their problems and they look to me for guidance and I nurture their abilities. I get six overnights every four weeks, plus 2 hour visits on Wednesdays.
4. I bet this is a pretty sizeable factor in men feeling as though the government is out to get them. Because, on this issue, it kind of is. And there's no question that it's the liberals who are driving this, and in particular liberal women.
And perhaps most importantly, it's not only the litigants! It's the kids. My eldest son called the judge a bitch when he learned of the outcome. He was pissed off that the first judge didn't listen to him or give his views any credence; now that the next judge decided to swallow a pack of lies from his mom and disregard his testimony, he's decided that judges are full of shit. Hey great job, liberals!
My twins are going to be really pissed that they can't spend more time with me. And whose fault will it be? It is, in fact, the judge's fault. And my kids are growing up, seeing that men and fathers are being devalued and they will get the message. My eldest -- I have completely confidence in him, and he wouldn't let his experience here leech out into his other views. But my twins? I don't know.
5. This is an issue that liberals need to fix. But they won't, because there are too many mouths being fed by the current system. If Trump just feels a need to destroy things, family court would have been a much better target. It needs disruption in the worst way. (Of course, I would not trust Trump to find a replacement and yes I know it's a state issue).