GOP & Policies toward/treatment of Transgender & other LGBTQ Americans

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 891
  • Views: 20K
  • Politics 
BlooVooDoo said:
So a relatively rare unfair physical advantage is a concern, but widespread use of performance enhancing substances conferring an obvious benefit is a trivial matter?
Click to expand...
This touches on another reason these issues should be handled by the governing bodies of the sport.
It may not be worth the resources or effort or whatever to make sure every junior high female volleyball player was born female.
The Olympics or pro sports may come to different conclusions.
 
ZenMode said:
No strawmanning allowed.

It's not either/or. This current discussion is about males and females.
Click to expand...
No, your premis is that there is an unfair advantage. So why would it be limited to the unfair advantage you claim and not all unfair advantages?
 
finesse said:
And your inability to grasp that isn't either/or at birth.
Click to expand...
He refuses to grasp it. For some reason he has an unnatural dislike for trans people and their mental wellbeing. He likes to play gotcha where the numbers will never support his promises. For every 1 trans female there will be multiple other "unfair advantage", but he doesn't want to talk about those.
 
ZenMode said:
Yes, because there is.

I never said there should be a limit. I said the current topic is male athletes competing in female sports.
Click to expand...
What is this shit: This current discussion is about males and females.

This is setting a limit. YOU set the limit of your discussion to be about males and females, which you do because you know you are basically bitching about one tree when ignoring the rest of the forest.

Please never respond to me. I only took you off of ignore so I could see other's responses.
 
UNCatTech said:
What is this shit: This current discussion is about males and females.

This is setting a limit. YOU set the limit of your discussion to be about males and females, which you do because you know you are basically bitching about one tree when ignoring the rest of the forest.

Please never respond to me. I only took you off of ignore so I could see other's responses.
Click to expand...
Don’t reply to him.

Write your post but not as a reply to him. Then, don’t reply to him ever.
 
UNCatTech said:
What is this shit: This current discussion is about males and females.
Click to expand...
Specifically trans females, but yes.
UNCatTech said:
This is setting a limit.
Click to expand...
Correct. I'm limiting it to not only the current discussion, but the thread topic. This is something that most posters seem to appreciate, if not request.
UNCatTech said:
YOU set the limit of your discussion to be about males and females, which you do because you know you are basically bitching about one tree when ignoring the rest of the forest.
Click to expand...
Or I'm literally sticking to the topic of the thread/discussion.
UNCatTech said:
Please never respond to me. I only took you off of ignore so I could see other's responses.
Click to expand...
Sorry, but you don't get to make accusations and then tell the accused that they can't respond.
 
During early development, the gonads of the fetus remain undifferentiated; that is, all fetal genitalia are the same and are pheno-typically female. After approximately 6 to 7 weeks of gestation, however, the expression of a gene on the Y chromosome induces changes that result in the development of the testes.

Looks like God created females first
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top