superrific
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 3,046
It had no chance to be expanded. It was a bizarre doctrine that applied, on its face, only to broadcast media on the idea that the public airwaves were a limited resource. At the same time it was upheld, a Fairness Doctrine type claim was rejected as applied to major city newspapers.That's true but it did signal a change in what was acceptable and eliminated any chance that it would be expanded.
If the Fairness Doctrine were resurrected, it would probably be overturned unanimously or close to it at the Supreme Court. The six conservatives would all be against it, as would Kagan for sure. Jackson, I haven't seen enough of her to predict issues with specificity -- but from what I've seen so far, I would put a 90%+ chance that she would vote to strike it down. Only Soto could be a vote for an expanded Fairness Doctrine and even then it would be improbable. The odds of a 9-0 rejection would be greater than 50% imo. The chances to get more than 2 votes for an expanded Fairness Doctrine is approximately zero.