Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The cult doesn't care if their gods break the laws.We all do know that's supposed to be illegal, right?
Just imagine the training our military will get! Putin will be quaking in his boots!"WE SHOULD USE SOME OF THESE DANGEROUS CITIES AS TRAINING GROUNDS FOR OUR MILITARY."
What the actual fuck? How is this okay? How can anyone defend this shit? What the fuck is going on? Goddamnit.
I hope not. They'll make a martyr out of this chiseler.somebody gonna take him out its just a matter of time
he's already their saviorI hope not. They'll make a martyr out of this chiseler.
That’s giving him far too much credit. Ram is 100% with it. He’s masturbating to this shit
I thought he was referring to Washington during the Whiskey Rebellion. Washington did not want to march against citizens while trump and hegseth are champing at the bit.George Washington —> Revolutionary War
Abraham Lincoln —> Civil War
Grover Cleveland deployed the military to Chicago to break up a train strike after a compliant court gave a court order to break the strike to protect interstate commerce and delivery of U.S. mail, and dozens of American casualties resulted from the resulting skirmishes. Eugene Debs got sent to prison as organizer of the strike. It is telling that Stephen Miller is having Trump cite the Pullman Railroad strike.
He also deployed the military to protect Chinese workers from angry American (white) workers in Seattle and Cheyenne who grew violent in opposition to the railroads importing cheap labor from China … basically, Cleveland used the army as the enforcement arm of railroad barons against the American labor movement.
Would be the absolute worst thing that could happen to the country right now, IMOsomebody gonna take him out its just a matter of time
How much will the media water down the content of this assembly today?
This precedes the meeting:
That's what I was thinking. And Abraham Lincoln used the Union army to suppress unrest in US cities, notably Baltimore and New York. He also suspended habeas corpus and allowed the military to arrest anybody if they were interfering with the movement of military supplies.I thought he was referring to Washington during the Whiskey Rebellion. Washington did not want to march against citizens while trump and hegseth are champing at the bit.
No, trying to maintain the union in the middle of a vicious civil war really couldn't be further from disagreements about foreign policy. Jesus, what a stupid comparison.That's what I was thinking. And Abraham Lincoln used the Union army to suppress unrest in US cities, notably Baltimore and New York. He also suspended habeas corpus and allowed the military to arrest anybody if they were interfering with the movement of military supplies.
He also used the military to arrest politicians and close newspapers that were in favor of ending the war and letting the Confederacy leave. That would be like Trump arresting politicians that didn't agree with his support for Israel or for advocating a peace in afghanistan during his first term. For all the good Lincoln did, that is a stain on his legacy and really doesn't get talked about enough.
Ahhh the N-word quote (actually just precedes the snippet above about our Sean Connery helmed stealth subs) — he was talking about sending subs off the coast of Russia
I doubt it was expressly planned, but his reference to the N-word could be taken a lot of ways in context of Hegseth’s speech that preceded Trump (Trump was not there and I’m sure would never have read the speech).
I agree with this to some extent, but at least Lincoln was dealing with a true national emergency - by far the greatest emergency in American history - the violent rebellion of nearly half the states in the Union. By contrast the America Trump inherited had plenty of problems but certainly nothing approaching a national emergency of that level. These efforts to declare economic, immigration, and cultural emergencies are just complete BS. So even if one agreed with Lincoln allowing some extremely harsh violations of civil liberties during the Civil War, there simply would be no justification for using them right now.That's what I was thinking. And Abraham Lincoln used the Union army to suppress unrest in US cities, notably Baltimore and New York. He also suspended habeas corpus and allowed the military to arrest anybody if they were interfering with the movement of military supplies.
He also used the military to arrest politicians and close newspapers that were in favor of ending the war and letting the Confederacy leave. That would be like Trump arresting politicians that didn't agree with his support for Israel or for advocating a peace in afghanistan during his first term. For all the good Lincoln did, that is a stain on his legacy and really doesn't get talked about enough.
You're okay with the president using the military to arrest duly elected politicians that disagree with their policies? Or are you saying it's only okay to arrest politicians during a civil war?No, trying to maintain the union in the middle of a vicious civil war really couldn't be further from disagreements about foreign policy. Jesus, what a stupid comparison.