p5mmr9
Distinguished Member
- Messages
- 466
Not really.The real question will be his leadership during this war. Jury is still out
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not really.The real question will be his leadership during this war. Jury is still out
It's only out for those who are insistent upon arguing in bad faith. For 35% of the nation, Hegseth is fantastic until Trump says he is awful. For 64% of the nation, he's already awful.
It's almost as if hiring a Fox talking head with no administrative experience and no experience leading the military (he is a veteran, but was never a high-ranking one), and who is a known heavy drinker with multiple accusations of sexual assault and harassment, to be the Secretary of Defense was a really, really bad idea. And that's without even getting into his clear pattern of racism and sexism. Trump's cabinet is a grossly incompetent clown show, plain and simple. They likely couldn't run a McDonald's smoothly, much less the entire federal government.Fuck Pete Hegshits. He sucks by any metric. He's a blight on our military and country. Fuck that fucking guy.
iT's sEcReTaRy oF wAr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!It's almost as if hiring a Fox talking head with no administrative experience and no experience leading the military (he is a veteran, but was never a high-ranking one), and who is a known heavy drinker with multiple accusations of sexual assault and harassment, to be the Secretary of Defense was a really, really bad idea. And that's without even getting into his clear pattern of racism and sexism. Trump's cabinet is a clown show, plain and simple.

And according to reports, one of the reasons George was fired was his refusal to remove black and female officers from the promotion list at Hegseth’s request. So I think it is reasonable to question a prejudicial angle to these firings.I think you're likely correct. He fired two white generals as well at about the same time. But it seems odd you would bring up race as a reason why he was or wasn't fired. And why would you ask me about it? I don't have any inside knowledge. Just a weird post.
Only in the sense that they both have fired senior officers at the beginning of a war. I thought that was quite obvious, but maybe I should have explained it in simpler terms for you.
This George C. Marshall:Only in the sense that they both have fired senior officers at the beginning of a war. I thought that was quite obvious, but maybe I should have explained it in simpler terms for you.
We weren't talking about Hegseth's bathroom habits. We were talking about him firing generals. Hegseth fired Generals at the beginning of a war and so have other officials including Marshal.This George C. Marshall:
![]()
George C. Marshall - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I am sure that they may have used the bathroom the same way but that doesn't make them comparable.
The constant attempt to imply logic behind any of Hegseth's decisions when all of these firings are clearly driven by purely political reasons is disingenuous as best.
We weren't talking about Hegseth's bathroom habits. We were talking about him firing generals. Hegseth fired Generals at the beginning of a war and so have other officials including Marshal.
How do you know that "all of these firings are clearly driven by purely political reasons"? That's a bold claim. Its been more than two dozen firings during his tenure both before and after the war started. I doubt you could even name them all much less know that all of the firings have been for political reasons. Maybe stick to arguing things you know instead of making wild claims or discussing men's bathroom habits.
According to the wikipedia, his professional experience includes media, nonprofit work, writing and the military.I’ll fully admit that I didn’t know who he was - had never heard his nene even - but expected trump’s man to be a negative. Once doing my homework it is pretty amazing how much of an incompetent buffoon he is along with being ideologically in line.
What does Hegseth have experience with other than "political things?"
Sounds like Chancellor Roberts experience with running a UniversityAccording to the wikipedia, his professional experience includes media, nonprofit work, writing and the military.
Hegseth's track record is such that I think it's a fair assumption to assume any major firing is likely political/cultural in nature rather than based on merit. Just like I think it's fair to assume that his blocking of the promotion of female and minority officers is not based on merit.We weren't talking about Hegseth's bathroom habits. We were talking about him firing generals. Hegseth fired Generals at the beginning of a war and so have other officials including Marshal.
How do you know that "all of these firings are clearly driven by purely political reasons"? That's a bold claim. Its been more than two dozen firings during his tenure both before and after the war started. I doubt you could even name them all much less know that all of the firings have been for political reasons. Maybe stick to arguing things you know instead of making wild claims or discussing men's bathroom habits.
Quite the researcher aren’t you?According to the wikipedia, his professional experience includes media, nonprofit work, writing and the military.
You and Zen are some bo siding idiots.We weren't talking about Hegseth's bathroom habits. We were talking about him firing generals. Hegseth fired Generals at the beginning of a war and so have other officials including Marshal.
How do you know that "all of these firings are clearly driven by purely political reasons"? That's a bold claim. Its been more than two dozen firings during his tenure both before and after the war started. I doubt you could even name them all much less know that all of the firings have been for political reasons. Maybe stick to arguing things you know instead of making wild claims or discussing men's bathroom habits.
Thank you, but its really not that hard. Google makes a question like yours very easy to answer.Quite the researcher aren’t you?
Um, here you prove again that you have no understanding of what racism is or how it operates. Few racists and misogynists are all-or-nothing. For one thing, they view minorities and women as helpful servants, entertainers and/or prostitutes. The key is subordination.Baptistnews?
He also promoted on black woman to a three star. It seems like a racist and/or woman hater would be an all or nothing kind of guy.
He probably thinks a person that says they have black friends can't be racist, too.Um, here you prove again that you have no understanding of what racism is or how it operates. Few racists and misogynists are all-or-nothing. For one thing, they view minorities and women as helpful servants, entertainers and/or prostitutes. The key is subordination.