Hubert Davis Catch-all

  • Thread starter Thread starter LeoBloom
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 466
  • Views: 8K
  • UNC Sports 
So, Hubert wins tonight and it continues to bode well for him. He loses, the fire him crowd gets a little life back. My two cents.
 
It's always flashes. No consistency within games or across games. We will never be a team that can string together enough strong performances to truly be a factor.
 
Well, if you're more consistent that means you usually win more than going ip and down winning and losing.
Right, you're just wanting UNC to win more consistently.

That's reasonable. I'm just saying winning more equals more consistency and that's what every program is striving for.
 
It's always flashes. No consistency within games or across games. We will never be a team that can string together enough strong performances to truly be a factor.
Truly be a factor in what? Do you think Hubert will never lead a team to the final four?
 
This one’s not on Hubert. Could not box out. Caleb forced some terrible shots. No one could make a shot in the 2nd half when we had multiple chances to tie or take the lead.

Felt like if we could get a 4pt lead we’d win but just didn’t make plays. Shit performance from Caleb and Henry. Seth and Derek nonexistent. Not enough effort or toughness.
 
It's always flashes. No consistency within games or across games. We will never be a team that can string together enough strong performances to truly be a factor.
I would think consistency within a game would a rare beast for any team much less ever become a consistent achievement. I'd also point out Hubert's first year disproves your theory about stringing together wins. I only cite that, since I do consider it a bit of an anomaly, because of how hasty you are to make that accusation and what a result merchant that makes you. How many rebuilding teams put together a history of " strong performances to truly be a factor"? How many teams do it at all?
 
Back
Top