Centerpiece
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 3,490
Saw this on the interwebs and thought it apropos:
"There will be a lot written about UNC basketball in the coming weeks. The question is Davis the right man for the job? By year five, you usually know what a coach is, not what they might become. Especially at a place like UNC where the infrastructure, recruiting pull, and expectations accelerate everything.
With Davis, I think we know who he is. I am not sure he does. I am not sure he realizes his weaknesses. When the talent level rises, the flaws don’t disappear—they just get masked until you hit elite competition. Then the same issues resurface, and it stops feeling like coincidence. Following Dean Smith and Roy Williams isn’t just about banners—it’s about in-game command. Those teams had a feel for when to grab control of a game before it slipped. That’s the piece people are comparing, whether it’s fair or not. Davis does not have that in his repertoire, and it appears he may never.
I honestly believe his identity is locked in by year five. The conversation, shifts from “will he evolve?” The fact is currently his teams cannot win at this level consistently and it becomes dangerous and not dependable in March. That is what the power people in the program need to figure out. I just hope with his ties to the program they make the change sooner than later."
"There will be a lot written about UNC basketball in the coming weeks. The question is Davis the right man for the job? By year five, you usually know what a coach is, not what they might become. Especially at a place like UNC where the infrastructure, recruiting pull, and expectations accelerate everything.
With Davis, I think we know who he is. I am not sure he does. I am not sure he realizes his weaknesses. When the talent level rises, the flaws don’t disappear—they just get masked until you hit elite competition. Then the same issues resurface, and it stops feeling like coincidence. Following Dean Smith and Roy Williams isn’t just about banners—it’s about in-game command. Those teams had a feel for when to grab control of a game before it slipped. That’s the piece people are comparing, whether it’s fair or not. Davis does not have that in his repertoire, and it appears he may never.
I honestly believe his identity is locked in by year five. The conversation, shifts from “will he evolve?” The fact is currently his teams cannot win at this level consistently and it becomes dangerous and not dependable in March. That is what the power people in the program need to figure out. I just hope with his ties to the program they make the change sooner than later."