—> ICE / Immigration / Chaos after another shooting in Minnesota

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 5K
  • Views: 170K
  • Politics 
Funny how the 2nd amendment nuts never care about the 4th.


The Associated Press obtained the memo and whistleblower complaint from an official in Congress, who shared it on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive documents. The AP verified the authenticity of the accounts in the complaint.

The memo, signed by the acting director of ICE, Todd Lyons, and dated May 12, 2025, says: “Although the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has not historically relied on administrative warrants alone to arrest aliens subject to final orders of removal in their place of residence, the DHS Office of the General Counsel has recently determined that the U.S. Constitution, the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the immigration regulations do not prohibit relying on administrative warrants for this purpose.”


The memo does not detail how that determination was made nor what its legal repercussions might be.

When asked about the memo, Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said in an emailed statement to the AP that everyone the department serves with an administrative warrant has already had “full due process and a final order of removal.”
 
Last edited:
Funny how the 2nd amendment nuts never care about the 4th.


The Associated Press obtained the memo and whistleblower complaint from an official in Congress, who shared it on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive documents. The AP verified the authenticity of the accounts in the complaint.

The memo, signed by the acting director of ICE, Todd Lyons, and dated May 12, 2025, says: “Although the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has not historically relied on administrative warrants alone to arrest aliens subject to final orders of removal in their place of residence, the DHS Office of the General Counsel has recently determined that the U.S. Constitution, the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the immigration regulations do not prohibit relying on administrative warrants for this purpose.”


The memo does not detail how that determination was made nor what its legal repercussions might be.

When asked about the memo, Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said in an emailed statement to the AP that everyone the department serves with an administrative warrant has already had “full due process and a final order of removal.”
 

JD Vance goes to Minneapolis amid ICE backlash, Trump feud with Walz​

A White House official said Vance will meet with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and deliver remarks praising their work.​


 

JD Vance goes to Minneapolis amid ICE backlash, Trump feud with Walz​

A White House official said Vance will meet with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and deliver remarks praising their work.​


I'm sure this will go well. Can't wait to hear our Vice President call the good people of Minnesota - his fellow citizens - radical leftist terrorist agitators all paid by George Soros, and portraying ICE agents who are literally beating unarmed people up, pepper spraying them in the face while they're being held by other agents, kicking in doors and taking people out of their homes without warrants, and just shooting them in some cases - as the real heroes in all this.
 

Off-duty Twin Cities officers among those “targeted” by ICE agents looking for proof of U.S. citizenship, chief says​

Off-duty police officers in the Twin Cities have been “targeted” by federal agents looking for proof of U.S. citizenship, Brooklyn Park Police Chief Mark Bruley said Tuesday.

Bruley was among several law enforcement leaders who expressed their concerns at a press conference that Operation Metro Surge is leading to “civil rights violations in our streets.”

He added that in the last two weeks, as community members have been submitting “endless complaints,” that several of the officers in his department had also been stopped by federal law enforcement.

U.S. Citizen, he said.

“When she became concerned about the rhetoric and the way she was being treated, she pulled out her phone in an attempt to record incident. The phone was knocked out of her hands,” Bruley said.

She eventually identified herself as a Brooklyn Park officer, at which point the agents left, he said.

“I wish I could tell you that this was an isolated incident. In fact, many of the chiefs standing behind me have similar incidents with their off-duty officers,” Bruley said. “This isn’t just important because it happened to off-duty officers, but what it did do is we know that our officers know what the Constitution is, they know what right and wrong is, and they know when people are being targeted. And that’s what they were.”

 
Interesting to hear Clay and Buch whine about sanctuary cities and how they shouldn’t exist because “federal law reigns supreme “. Indeed it does unless you’re referring the president who is above the law as the founding fathers intended.

Fucking hypocrites.
 

Judge rejects Justice Department’s initial attempt to bring charges against Don Lemon​



“… “The Attorney General is enraged at the magistrate judge’s decision,” a person familiar with the matter said. Attorney General Pam Bondi has been on the ground in Minnesota for two days meeting with federal prosecutors from the state.

Lemon, who is a former CNN host who now makes content independently, was with dozens of anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement protesters as they rushed into Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, on Sunday morning, interrupting a church service and leading to tense confrontations, CNN has reported.

Lemon has said that he was present at the demonstration as a journalist and not as a protester. In a video of the episode that he posted on YouTube, Lemon says “I’m just here photographing, I’m not part of the group… I’m a journalist.”

…In Lemon’s case, Justice Department officials immediately, and publicly, asserted that he would face charges. They said Lemon did not have a right to be on the church’s private property, adding that interrupting the service may have impeded in the churchgoers’ constitutional rights to express their religion….”
 
Back
Top