—> ICE / Immigration | Venezuelans in Salvadoran Prison released to Venezuela in prisoner exchange

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 86K
  • Politics 
TangledUpInBlue06 said:
Are you asking me whether laws should be followed and enforced? My answer is yes.

What's your answer? Do you think laws, including the due process clause of the Constitution, should be followed and enforced?
Click to expand...
Where were you when they weren't being enforced with illegally entry with the help of Biden and his cohorts?
 
Silence Dogood said:
Where were you when they weren't being enforced with illegally entry with the help of Biden and his cohorts?
Click to expand...
I was doing my job forcing the government to follow the law in my area of specialty, which is not immigration.

So, back to my question. Do you think laws, including the due process clause of the Constitution, should be followed and enforced?
 
TangledUpInBlue06 said:
I was doing my job forcing the government to follow the law in my area of specialty, which is not immigration.

So, back to my question. Do you think laws, including the due process clause of the Constitution, should be followed and enforced?
Click to expand...
Lol ok. Yes, but I'm for deportation of those that came into the country illegally immediately. We don't have the time and resources to play your game with overwhelming the system. I notice due process only works for you when leaving the country, how convenient.
 
lawtig02 said:
In case this was directed to me, I was fucking up a bunch of gringos with my buddy Stephen Miller. You were there too, though, so why are you asking?
Click to expand...
You're not making any valid points. Just shows you favor illegal immigration more than legal immigration.
 
Silence Dogood said:
Lol ok. Yes, but I'm for deportation of those that came into the country illegally immediately. We don't have the time and resources to play your game with overwhelming the system. I notice due process only works for you when leaving the country, how convenient.
Click to expand...
Your "Yes" is immediately followed by your explanation of why you really mean "No." There is no "but it might be expensive and time consuming" exception to the 14th amendment.

I've got no clue what your last sentence means. I think you were trying to suggest I only care about due process in certain situations?? If selective due process is bad, why are you advocating for selective due process? I'm for due process in every instance it is owed.
 
TangledUpInBlue06 said:
Your "Yes" is immediately followed by your explanation of why you really mean "No." There is no "but it might be expensive and time consuming" exception to the 14th amendment.

I've got no clue what your last sentence means. I think you were trying to suggest I only care about due process in certain situations?? If selective due process is bad, why are you advocating for selective due process? I'm for due process in every instance it is owed.
Click to expand...
Prove to me you were for due process coming into the country illegally.
 
Silence Dogood said:
You're not making any valid points. Just shows you favor illegal immigration more than legal immigration.
Click to expand...
Sort of. I favor Tren de Aragua, not the rest of those illegals. And don't play coy here, Silence. You and Stevie M. do, too. You were both showing me your tattoos at our meeting this past Monday.
 
TangledUpInBlue06 said:
Do you mean prove I'm for people entering the country legally? What is "due process coming into the country illegally?" And how would you suggest I prove that?
Click to expand...
On this message board. Show where you were against illegal entry. Google says due process means following established legal rules and principles to ensure a fair and impartial outcome. So what legal rules were followed during the illegal entry?
 
Silence Dogood said:
On this message board. Show where you were against illegal entry. Google says due process means following established legal rules and principles to ensure a fair and impartial outcome. So what legal rules were followed during the illegal entry?
Click to expand...
This is going to fucking blow your mind, my Russian friend. We have these things called statutes here. They actually have the FORCE OF LAW!!! Can you believe it? It's not all about what our dictator du jour says!

 
Silence Dogood said:
On this message board. Show where you were against illegal entry. Google says due process means following established legal rules and principles to ensure a fair and impartial outcome. So what legal rules were followed during the illegal entry?
Click to expand...
Lol. Thanks for googling due process. You're getting warmer, so keep it up.

Your question is silly. What legal rules were followed during an illegal act? Uh, not many, hence the illegality.

It may also surprise you that I've not reduced every thought or belief I've ever had to writing on this message board. But if you want proof on this message board where I'm against illegal entry, here you go:

TangledUpInBlue06 said:
Are you asking me whether laws should be followed and enforced? My answer is yes.

What's your answer? Do you think laws, including the due process clause of the Constitution, should be followed and enforced?
Click to expand...
 
Silence Dogood said:
Keep burying your head in the sand. We have news stories of the crimes. Regardless of what skewed numbers your using you don't add to crime by saying its only a lesser type of crime, thats assisine. Separating the groups does no good, crime is crime. We can't get rid of the crime here per se, but we sure don't need to add to it. Plus alot of crime is underreported with illegals, from fear of deportations.
Click to expand...
So given your assertion that "crime is crime" shouldn't we be deporting more American citizens who commit more crimes than do undocumented immigrants ?

and a whole bunch of American citizen crime is "underreported"

Just trying to understand your tortured logic here...
 
heelinhell said:
So given your assertion that "crime is crime" shouldn't we be deporting more American citizens who commit more crimes than do undocumented immigrants ?

and a whole bunch of American citizen crime is "underreported"

Just trying to understand your tortured logic here...
Click to expand...
Why have no vetting and bring in any type of crime if crime is already a problem. Basic common sense. You want to fight crime by adding to it, dumb. We can't deport citizens, more common sense. You're defending the indefensible. So maybe solve our issues and not bring anymore of it in, I know its complicated for you
 
TangledUpInBlue06 said:
Lol. Thanks for googling due process. You're getting warmer, so keep it up.

Your question is silly. What legal rules were followed during an illegal act? Uh, not many, hence the illegality.

It may also surprise you that I've not reduced every thought or belief I've ever had to writing on this message board. But if you want proof on this message board where I'm against illegal entry, here you go:
Click to expand...
Right, how convenient the laws were already broken and now pretending to take the high road and want to be the defender of all things law abiding. Fraud.
 
Silence Dogood said:
Right, how convenient the laws were already broken and now pretending to take the high road and want to be the defender of all things law abiding. Fraud.
Click to expand...
You will again be surprised to learn that lawyers swear an oath to uphold the law and the Constitution.

If you move the goalposts any farther, they're going to cross a border illegally.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top