My understanding is that Ben and Buck are co-owners. They pay a portion of the dues to 247 for the network (or more accurately, 247 takes a cut of the dues that are collected).Who actually owns IC? What is the hierarchy within the PTB?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My understanding is that Ben and Buck are co-owners. They pay a portion of the dues to 247 for the network (or more accurately, 247 takes a cut of the dues that are collected).Who actually owns IC? What is the hierarchy within the PTB?
This is the same understanding I have.My understanding is that Ben and Buck are co-owners. They pay a portion of the dues to 247 for the network (or more accurately, 247 takes a cut of the dues that are collected).
Damn you, now I want to google rosebudding...We'll I didn't...
Until you mentioned it again. I probably should have known better.
It wasn't nearly as disturbing as some words I've mistakenly Google over the years.
Not in the same ballpark as rosebudding.
we need the duesMy understanding is that Ben and Buck are co-owners. They pay a portion of the dues to 247 for the network (or more accurately, 247 takes a cut of the dues that are collected).
But the dude assured us that everyone disagreeing with him is liberal (I'm sure that will be news to you) and making emotional arguments. Of course he didn't answer the question.Yes, it is possible to for both heterosexual and homosexual to be normal. Ability to have children isn't the only qualifier here.
That is also why I asked, without answer, about how one with such a binary belief system would classify other human traits that are along a spectrum.
Like skin color, eye color, and hair color, which is "normal". It would be highly offensive for one to claim that white skin is normal and those whose skin is not white to be abnormal.
My beliefe is this was simply a way to try and mask unacceptable personal biases.
Example: I'm not homophobic but, you know that gay people are not normal, since they can't have kids.
At my law firm we used to have what we called the “bukakke test.” It all started circa 2007 when we were handling a case involving a madam of a very high end escort service. One of my partners had access to her email account. The client would get emails from people who were applying for jobs with her escort service. They were quite entertaining. They would actually submit resumes.How many children of the ZZL googled bukakke after Sooner told them to?
it doesn't always have to be used in that context to make it incorrect and insulting in some situations.I never said the dictionary definitions were wrong. Typical isn't always. Abnormal can be used in a positive way. A basketball player can be abnormally tall. A gifted student can be abnormally intelligent, etc.
Approximately how many zzl posters (daily/weekly) were there before the split? Once it split what did the numbers become zzlp vs zzl ?I moderated the ZZL and ZZLP for almost 8 years. It was a shitshow.
What questions do you have about IC? Or being an IC mod? Or about the ZZL or ZZLP? Or about whatever else?
Ask me anything
No idea.Approximately how many zzl posters (daily/weekly) were there before the split? Once it split what did the numbers become zzlp vs zzl ?
It’s no “Rusty Venture,” I’ll tell you that.Damn you, now I want to google rosebudding...
You see those as positive?I never said the dictionary definitions were wrong. Typical isn't always. Abnormal can be used in a positive way. A basketball player can be abnormally tall. A gifted student can be abnormally intelligent, etc.
Positive or negative really doesn't matter if it fits the definition.You see those as positive?
No one would call a gifted person abnormally intelligent.
I doubt anyone would take "abnormal intelligence" as a compliment.
Disturbingly, I'm not sure I could honestly reject the term if applied to me.You see those as positive?
No one would call a gifted person abnormally intelligent.
I doubt anyone would take "abnormal intelligence" as a compliment.
See i don't agree that homosexuality is abnormal, because that is a binary response to something that is not binary. There is a spectrum. Even from a biological stand point, there are people who have both male and female sex organs. From the stand point of chromosomes there are more than two options. Then factor in the mental aspect and any concept of binary is blown away.Positive or negative really doesn't matter if it fits the definition.
Edit: I don't know what I have said previously, but what I meant is that homosexuality is abnormal, not that homosexuals should be labeled as abnormal people.
If one were to say I'm of abnormal intelligence I would take it as an insult.Disturbingly, I'm not sure I could honestly reject the term if applied to me.![]()
To be clear, I wasn't at the level where I got looped in on such topics, but this is my best guess is concerning those 4 things.Can you rank from below what you feel IC's decision-makers are most concerned with?
a. Enhancing and preserving the reputation of UNC athletics
b. Selling Premium memberships
c. Increasing advertising revenue
d. Tracking the browsing habits of its users, paid and free.