Iran Catch-All | IRAN WAR

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 4K
  • Views: 115K
  • Politics 


Is it considered a kneejerk, emotional, TDS-induced reaction to be worried about this very plausible and even probable scenario occurring? Is this all part of the “art of the deal”? Asking for our resident angry little man from down in the lesser Carolina.
 


Hey now! It looks like…..wait a sec…checks notes…rubs eyes….Erik Prince- ERIK PRINCE of all friggin people!- is having an emotional TDS-induced reaction to this whole situation. Imagine!
 
CFordUNC said:
Haha yeah it did. I apologize for my role in it. I don’t even drink! I just have a real weakness for responding to ramrouser’s stupid drunken shitposting with stupid sober shitposting of my own.
Click to expand...
For the record, I agree with Ro Laren on this.

There's shitposting, and then there's "waste of a human orgasm" or whatever you wrote. This is dehumanizing language. My brother does it, same way as you, and I find it noxious there too.

Surely there is a way to shit post and mock and trash talk without trivializing people into nothingness.
 
superrific said:
For the record, I agree with Ro Laren on this.

There's shitposting, and then there's "waste of a human orgasm" or whatever you wrote. This is dehumanizing language. My brother does it, same way as you, and I find it noxious there too.

Surely there is a way to shit post and mock and trash talk without trivializing people into nothingness.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I totally agree with that. I was way over the top with that stuff. Not my proudest moment on here, for sure.
 
Icky Mettle said:
Weird choice for a target if that’s the motivation.
Click to expand...
If that's the motivation then weird choices are the right choices. The point of terrorism is to create terror, not let Americans sleep soundly in the knowledge that they are safe.

I am skeptical that "Qu'ran in the car" = terrorism without more, but who knows.
 
1moretimeagain said:
It may be naive to have believed Iran has been on the doorstep of nuclear weapons for several decades.

Take a look at Iran’s retaliatory response after the US obliterated Iran’s nuclear site. There was essentially no response aside from something face-saving to be marketed to their domestic population. IIRC correctly they even released a statement afterwards to make perfectly clear that they weren’t going to take any further action.

That tells me they have nothing for the US, so no I didn’t consider them a threat to US national security
Click to expand...

Iran has been so trustworthy in the past haven’t they?

What effect would nuking Israel have on our national security? The world economy? The global oil supply?

To say Israel could attack us is incorrect. If they could get a nuke they could certainly find a way to get it here.
 
CFordUNC said:
Yeah, I totally agree with that. I was way over the top with that stuff. Not my proudest moment on here, for sure.
Click to expand...
By the way, Ro Laren is a fan of Norwegian black metal. People who dress up like this, and sometimes even mean it:

en.wikipedia.org

Corpse paint - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

If he says you've gone too far -- keep in mind, this is a scene in which a band once put a photo of the post-suicidal body of their singer on their album cover, and whose other member was murdered by the bassist for a different band -- then probably you should listen.
 
Going back to my above post, it occurs to me that we have lost Americans and likely to lose more. So if Trump can't figure out what his goals are (flip flops) then what does that say to the loved ones of those lost or those who are doing the fighting?

Tomorrow, Democrats are going to have to figure out what their attack angle is. I suggest they use this one.
 
Callatoroy said:
That seems a little naive. Even if that were true, nuking Israel doesnt pose a threat to our national security?

“Canada’s position remains clear: the Islamic Republican of Iran is the principal source of instability and terror throughout the Middle East, has one of the world’s worst human rights records, and must never be allowed to obtain or develop nuclear weapons,”
Click to expand...
Where, when and who is that from?
 
Callatoroy said:
Iran has been so trustworthy in the past haven’t they?

What effect would nuking Israel have on our national security? The world economy? The global oil supply?

To say Israel could attack us is incorrect. If they could get a nuke they could certainly find a way to get it here.
Click to expand...
The only use of nuclear weapons was during WWII, and it was done when no other countries had nukes.

If nukes haven't been used since then, why the hell do you think that Iran would be the first? They're just going to do a nuclear weapons version of rolling up and unloading a magazine?

Nuclear weapons are not offensive weapons. They are defensive weapons. No nuclear armed country has ever been attacked militarily, save possible minor skirmishes on a contested border that amount to nothing. Everyone but MAGA knows this, and you keep falling for the same bullshit over and over again. Unfortunately you drag us down with you.

Remember when it was "the world be more dangerous if North Korea gets nukes"? I don't feel any more endangered with KJU sitting on a few warheads. If Iran got nukes, the world would be exactly as dangerous as before.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top