Iran Catch-All | IRAN WAR

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 5K
  • Views: 150K
  • Politics 
nycfan said:


IMG_5536.jpeg
Click to expand...

So they're going to claim that Iran hit one of their own schools and killed all those kids? With what? An artillery shell? I doubt it would have caused that much damage, and it's very unlikely that an Iranian missile or drone would have hit a school within the city. It's pretty clear that either Israel or the US hit the school. But no doubt they're going to lie and deny what happened to the bitter end.
 
Bobfripp said:
That wasn't what I was getting it at. But it's clear the war is a fringe benefit for Putin. Trump is a chaos agent, he doesn't think that deeply about causes and effects (like helping Putin) and that's the problem.
Click to expand...
If you believe that, for a variety of reasons, military action against Iran is justified, I don't think oil revenue for Russia is a consideration in that decision.
 
altmin said:
Click to expand...

Given how pro-war Graham is, I so wish someone would forcibly take him to Iran, put him in a combat uniform with helmet and weapon, and tell him to get out there and fight like he's making all of these other people do. My guess is he would curl up in a fetal position, cry like a baby, and beg to be taken home.
 
ZenMode said:
If you believe that, for a variety of reasons, military action against Iran is justified, I don't think oil revenue for Russia is a consideration in that decision.
Click to expand...
LOL, if you think Trump does ANYTHING internationally without the encouragement and approval of Putin, you are naive beyond belief.
 
ZenMode said:
If you believe that, for a variety of reasons, military action against Iran is justified, I don't think oil revenue for Russia is a consideration in that decision.
Click to expand...
Yes, increased oil revenue for Putin, so he can continue to kill Ukrainians, is a consideration. It's just one of many considerations that the Trump administration didn't take into account when beginning Operation Epic Fury.
 
Bobfripp said:
Yes, increased oil revenue for Putin, so he can continue to kill Ukrainians, is a consideration. It's just one of many considerations that the Trump administration didn't take into account when beginning Operation Epic Fury.
Click to expand...
If You are talking about a country that funds terrorism around the world, is clearly dedicated to their nuclear weapons program and killed tens of thousands of protesters, you think you consider a short-term revenue increase for Russia when deciding what action to take?
 
ZenMode said:
If You are talking about a country that funds terrorism around the world, is clearly dedicated to their nuclear weapons program and killed tens of thousands of protesters, you think you consider a short-term revenue increase for Russia when deciding what action to take?
Click to expand...
Donald trump made this decision. He does not do anything that is not directly put in front of him and has a tangible return for himself. Donald Trump doesnt care about any of the things you mention.
 
ZenMode said:
If You are talking about a country that funds terrorism around the world, is clearly dedicated to their nuclear weapons program and killed tens of thousands of protesters, you think you consider a short-term revenue increase for Russia when deciding what action to take?
Click to expand...
Um, yeah. Considering repercussions of one's actions is usually important. Or, just bomb away and hope for the best? You think like Trump.
And, you know it's short-term? How do you know this?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top