Iran Catch-All | Protester Massacre? CBS reports 12,000+ killed

  • Thread starter Thread starter theel4life
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 3K
  • Views: 72K
  • Politics 
Huh? said:
We are the only ones who can take out Fordow from the air. Only US pilots can fly US-owned B-2s needed to drop US-owned MOABs.
Click to expand...
I think you are confusing MOAB with a bunker buster type bomb.

MOAB is an air blast thermobaric weapon. It would be completely useless against that facility.
 
4thgenheel said:
and it would put the entire western world, america in particular, at a heightened risk of retaliatory terror attacks.
Click to expand...
Good thing Biden isn’t in control of the border now. Of course Iranian terrorists could have easily come into this country over the last 4 years.
 
heelslegup said:
Saw interview today on CNN with Barak Ravid of Axios erc who said it has become a race of what holds up longer: Israel's supply of intervept missiles vs Irtanian launders and ballistic missiles. He saeem ed to suggest that the outcome is up in air and Isreal could potentially run out and be defgenseless.
Click to expand...
Started a little early today, eh legup?
 
gregh1 said:
Again, what is to keep them from being destructive to America even if Iran's own facilities are incapacitated. We know they're somewhat advanced in cyber-warfare. 9/11 showed us that it doesn't take much to inflict harm.

What's the end game after we're done dropping bombs and shooting missiles (however long that takes)? We tried regime change in Iraq and that gave us Isis. We're still in Iraq. We basically stalemated with the Taliban in Afghanistan and Iran is TWICE as large as Afghanistan.
Click to expand...
I think the world is safer if a Muslim terrorist country doesn't have a nuke and I don't mind if a US bomb is the final straw that breaks the Fardow back to ensure that Iran doesn't have a nuke anytime soon and hopefully never.

If the US has to drop another bomb on Iran in 10 years, because they're close to being nuclear, I'll very likely be fine with that, also.
 
Last edited:
ZenMode said:
I think the world is safer if a Muslim terrorist country doesn't have a nuke and I don't mind if a US bomb is the final straw that breaks the Fardow back to ensure that Iran doesn't have a nuke anytime soon and hopefully never.

If the US has to drop another bomb on Iran in 10 years, because they're close to being nuclear, I'll very likely be fine with that, also.
Click to expand...
Pakistan sheltered the biggest terrorist of all time. They have the bomb. I don't think you can use that as justification for going to war.
 


The Iraq war was definitely based on questionable (intentionally generated) intel, but that was not any kind of pre-nuclear age. [Also, it is hardly worth arguing anymore but Trump manufactured most of his claims of opposing the Iraq war at the time, inasmuch as anyone cared what he thought then anyway.]
 


IMG_7543.jpeg

[I actually think there are several key differences between the Iraq invasion debacle and the current situation, though I’m still glad I don’t have to decide what to do in the current case, but as far as Donalds seems concerned that N at the end of the name instead of a Q seems to be enough?]
 
And, Iran also bombed an Israeli hospital. They didn't bomb it because IDF is using it for cover, they just bombed it just 'cause.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top