Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Israel Hamas War, West Bank, Etc. | Hostilities resume

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 76K
  • Politics 
If you have a NYT sub and haven't listened to Ezra Klein's interview with Ehud Barak - you should. I am pretty pessimistic about Israel's political situation and its relationships with its neighbors, but. I think Barak has always been a light in the darkness, and he is no different here.


So yes, look, it’s very hard for the Israelis to overcome, in generations, the obsession of being the victims of hatred. We so much fell in love with the status of being the underdog, the victim of hatred, of antisemitism, of discrimination, of segregation, of whatever — that we fall into this in every possible occasion that we have. And it’s so easy for so many among us to say: OK, what do they want from us? Don’t we have a right to defend ourselves after what they did on the 7th of October? So now we are defending ourselves. But when we defend ourselves, they hate us. and they attack us, and they riot against us and whatnot.

This is part of the emotional immaturity which has characterized the state of Israel since its proclamation. Also because we had many different occasions in which we could argue that when we were ready for compromise, the other side was not, and as a result of it, we were dragged into these endless wars when it could have been resolved.

One of the problems that I personally have is that whenever I argue, people say to me: Hey, are you not an example? You proposed a comprehensive solution to the Palestinians in 2008 that is entirely compatible with everything that they were demanding all these years: a two-state solution on the basis of ’67’s, with the Old City of Jerusalem not under the exclusive sovereignty of either Israel or Palestine but under a trust of five nations, of which Israel and Palestine were to be part, also with America, with Saudi Arabia, with Jordan, and that you agreed to negotiate the refugee issue within the framework of the Arab Peace Initiative. This was the spirit of what I said in Annapolis, and this is what I presented Abu Mazen as a peace plan, representing the government of Israel, and the outcome was that they didn’t sign. They never said no, it’s true, but they never said yes.

So people come to me now and say: What do they want? Do they want peace? The fact is that they failed to answer you when you presented them with everything that they wanted. So this is a strong argument, and this is something that so many Israelis are anxious to fall in love with, to prove that the other side is not ready and is untrustable and unreliable and never will be accepting and so on and so forth.

But let’s not forget: From 2009 until now, the Israeli government didn’t want to make peace. No Israeli government at that time was ready to embark on a meaningful, serious process of negotiations similar to what I did. Also, in all those years, the security agencies of the Palestinian Authority cooperated with the Israeli Secret Service in order to battle terror from the West Bank. And at the same time, the Israeli government ignored the Palestinian Authority and cultivated Hamas with money that came from Qatar.

But at the end of the day, so many of the Israelis say: Listen, we don’t want to hear about that. We don’t want to deal with that. They hate us. They didn’t want to make peace. They’re terrorists. They’re fundamentalists. They are ayatollahs. They are jihadis. They are whatnot. And we have to be strong and defend ourselves.

OK, we have to cope with this, and we have to change it. For me, it’s my life’s mission. I have nothing else to fight for but to try and change this and contribute to change this balance.
 
June 21, 2025, 8:06 p.m. ETJust now
David E. Sanger
By the time U.S. aircraft bombed the Natanz nuclear site, the International Atomic Energy Agency assessed that all the centrifuges in its hall, about 100 feet underground, had been knocked out by Israel’s attack on the electrical system that fed the machines, which spin at supersonic speeds. But the U.S. bombs would have likely done far more damage to the facility, the same one that the Bush and Obama administrations hit more than 15 years ago in the Stuxnet cyber attack. That covert attack was undertaken because both Bush and Obama considered bombing to be too risky.
 
The attack on the sites is the first time since the Iranian revolution, in 1979, that the United States has sent its Air Force to strike major facilities inside the country, an act of war. But President Trump has now inserted the U.S. military directly into an open conflict with Iran, which a succession of American presidents, dating back to Jimmy Carter, tried to avoid. Mr. Trump made no effort in his Truth Social post to justify what administration officials said would be a pre-emptive attack, to keep Iran from a final race for the bomb.
 
You know Lyndsey wouldn't be able to contain his erection on this.

Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina and one of the most vocal Iran defense hawks on Capitol Hill, celebrated the strike, saying in a social media post that it was “the right call.” Graham had been in regular contact with President Trump to argue in favor of strikes. In his post on Saturday, he said, “The regime deserves it.”
 
A U.S. official said that six B-2 bombers dropped a dozen 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs on the Fordo nuclear site, which lies deep underground, and Navy submarines fired 30 TLAM cruise missiles at the Natanz and Isfahan sites. One B-2 also dropped two bunker busters on Natanz, according to the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss military operations.
 
and this dickhead

Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, whose unqualified support for Israel has put him at odds with other members of his party, was one of the few Democrats to offer an immediate statement of support. He wrote on social media that the military action “was the correct move.”

“Iran is the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities,” Mr. Fetterman added. “I’m grateful for and salute the finest military in the world.”
 
IMG_7552.jpeg



IMG_7553.jpeg
Very skeptical. Went to the Palestinian news site and couldn't find an article or editorial about Hamas killing people looking for food. I did find the picture of the guy pointing a gun at the people wearing blindfolds. The caption wasn't about collaborators. It was "
The resistance carries out "revolutionary death sentences" against those involved in the robbery of aid convoys."

Link

Now that anyone can translate, Israeli propaganda will need to step up their game.
 
Very skeptical. Went to the Palestinian news site and couldn't find an article or editorial about Hamas killing people looking for food. I did find the picture of the guy pointing a gun at the people wearing blindfolds. The caption wasn't about collaborators. It was "
The resistance carries out "revolutionary death sentences" against those involved in the robbery of aid convoys."

Link

Now that anyone can translate, Israeli propaganda will need to step up their game.
This is a U.S. run site, with a very distinguished board of former U.S. foreign policy experts (albeit founded by a former Israeli intel officer). They could well be pumping out propaganda in concert with Israel and others, but it is not directly an Israeli propaganda operation. But it is decidedly pro-Israel.
 
This is a U.S. run site, with a very distinguished board of former U.S. foreign policy experts (albeit founded by a former Israeli intel officer). They could well be pumping out propaganda in concert with Israel and others, but it is not directly an Israeli propaganda operation. But it is decidedly pro-Israel.
Can't argue with that board. Those guys are big time. Just can't find anything like they're describing in their post either the picture saying Hamas is shooting collaborators or the editorial they mentioned Hamas is shooting people trying to get food.

If they are somehow making the claim that Hamas is shooting people trying to get food who are thieves, I think that's a pretty tortured interpretation of the column and certainly detracts from their credibility. Would it have been that hard for them to provide a link so we can read it for ourselves?
 
Can't argue with that board. Those guys are big time. Just can't find anything like they're describing in their post either the picture saying Hamas is shooting collaborators or the editorial they mentioned Hamas is shooting people trying to get food.

If they are somehow making the claim that Hamas is shooting people trying to get food who are thieves, I think that's a pretty tortured interpretation of the column and certainly detracts from their credibility. Would it have been that hard for them to provide a link so we can read it for ourselves?
Not denying your original post and highly disappointed to read that. It is a site I read on background but don’t post here because it has obvious bias but is a way to get ME news (or direction to look up other accounts of what they cover at Al Jazeera etc.). Of course the first time I post something from there it is sketchy. I will take down the link.
 
Not denying your original post and highly disappointed to read that. It is a site I read on background but don’t post here because it has obvious bias but is a way to get ME news (or direction to look up other accounts of what they cover at Al Jazeera etc.). Of course the first time I post something from there it is sketchy. I will take down the link.
Don't do it because of my comment. I'm not denying that the Palestinian editorial is there or maybe it was there and they took it down. I just couldn't find it, and the site is not really that big. I did see that picture with a caption that did not have anything to do with collaborators. I guess it's possible the Palestinian newspaper could have changed it but just seems unlikely.
 
since I went to bed, Trump declared he brokered a ceasefire, Israel confirmed, then Iran fired missiles and Israel says ceasefire is off

So there you go.
 
The value of the ceasefire is too great to let the one Iranian attack be the end of the pursuit of it. Israel and the US should try its best to move forward and give Iran another shot at it.
 
Back
Top