ZenMode
Legend of ZZL
- Messages
- 5,102
The irony of the most condescending poster calling me arrogant.Yes. Theirs is informed. Yours is a willful misreading of a treaty you don't understand and a complete ignorance of everything that has happened since. An "opinion" without basis is trash.
There is nothing in the definition of genocide that requires it to be conducted as quickly as it possibly could be. Russia could destroy the globe with nukes in 15 minutes, so I guess that means they can't commit genocide.
And "intent" doesn't mean what you think it does, as every lawyer -- even Ramrouser! -- knows. Intent does not require a confession. Intent is not cloaked by plausible deniability. Intent can be inferred from actions, as well as statements.
I'm not talking about this with you any more. I don't fraternize with arrogant mooks.
It has nothing to do with arrogance. It has to do with a) a definition of a word and b) observing the objective events that would show genocide is occuring.
Hamas killed 1100 civilians in around 8 hours. They did that with knives and hand-held guns.
If Israel just matched that rate of civilian death, there would be well over 500,000 dead Palestinians by now.
The onus is on those who claim there's a genocide happening to explain why they believe that, given that the facts show otherwise.
Last edited: