J6 News Catch-All

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 510
  • Views: 20K
Agree. Some weren't even rowdy. Some calmly walked in, after the mayhem at the start, and took pictures of the inside of the Capitol.
They were all part of a violent mob intent on insurrection, even if individual participants weren't violent.

These people were tantamount to the audience to a lynching. But I'm sure that they appreciate your kind support.
 
Agree. Some weren't even rowdy. Some calmly walked in, after the mayhem at the start, and took pictures of the inside of the Capitol.
Plenty of people in the 3rd Reich toured Dachau and took pictures but never actively tortured or killed. They were still criminals.
 
Great. We're comparing peaceful, . misdemeanor trespassers to the Nazis.

Officially off the rails.....
Um, no, literally he compared those "trespassers" to peaceful German trespassers. They weren't Nazis, and that was literally the point. You are in particularly poor form today. You've got to throw the grenade after you pull the pin, you know.
 
Um, no, literally he compared those "trespassers" to peaceful German trespassers. They weren't Nazis, and that was literally the point. You are in particularly poor form today. You've got to throw the grenade after you pull the pin, you know.
The point was to reference Nazis, hence, out of all of the possible examples of trespassing, the one used was 3rd Reich/Dachau.

Or do you actually believe it was just a coincidence?
 
The point was to reference Nazis, hence, out of all of the possible examples of trespassing, the one used was 3rd Reich/Dachau.

Or do you actually believe it was just a coincidence?
I think he was failing miserably at duplicating Republican hate speech and race baiting. If you need examples , turn on anything but rightwing media. Hell, it's probably there, too but they consider it fair commentary.
 
The point was to reference Nazis, hence, out of all of the possible examples of trespassing, the one used was 3rd Reich/Dachau.

Or do you actually believe it was just a coincidence?
Of course it wasn't. It's not hard to understand what was meant: witnessing a massive crime and doing nothing, even without intent to aid the conspirators, is itself worthy of excoriation.

What those "tourists" did, of course, was give cover to the insurrectionists for mooks like you. Look at how they've baited you into focusing on that and not the literal armed attack on the American government.
 
Look at how they've baited you into focusing on that and not the literal armed attack on the American government.
I'm not focusing on either side. All I said was that one side (Left) wants to portray all J6ers one way and the other side (Right) wants to portray all J6ers another way

Apparently such a statement is so controversial that it turns into a multi-page discussion. 🙄
 
Back
Top