Jaden Ivey waived by Bulls for being a bigot

ZenMode said:
I don't think you need much beyond a 10th grade biology education to know that a male can't get a male pregnant and a female can't get a female pregnant. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Click to expand...
This is 2nd grade...maybe 1st.

Jaden claims to be religious and not gay...I just think you both suffer from frustration of figuring out this world without any logic. Thats tough and/or you don't get to live your truth...and lash out at the world.
 
ZenMode said:
Biblically and biologically speaking, he is right, but he has to be smarter than that. You can't put that kind of stuff on social media when you are a professional athlete.
Click to expand...
When did righteousness become a biological variable.

Also, many scholars of theology will disagree with you on this being biblical.

But we all know you, you take any opportunity you have to demonstrating your bigotry toward LBGTQ people. While I know you will disagree and claim you are not a bigot, your post over the years tell the true story.

Additionally, the Bible is only relevant to those who believe. It has no bearing in the lives of those that don't believe. So to claim something is biblical is not a valid argument.
 
breepf said:
He’s not “biblically” right, dumbass, because the Bible has no concept of homosexuality in the modern sense. The Bible and the ancient world more generally have a distaste for catching, but you can pitch to whoever you want. The power bottom is beyond reckoning.
Click to expand...
It's zen, we should expect no less.
 
ZenMode said:
Just a supporter of things that are true. I'm not gay and I'm an atheist, so I have no dog in this fight.
Click to expand...
No you are not. Your a supporter of your opinion and nothing more.

You've been presented evidence from doctors and others that actually study these things that contusion your worthless opinion and you still throw it out there and claim it to be true.

I'll never understand why you hate people for wanting to be their authentic selves and want to experience love in their life.
 
sunnyheel said:
Why is that when conservatives hear about the gay all they can think about is sex?
Click to expand...
Really they only seem to think about sex for many topics.

This one is particularly bad because it's not about sex it's about love. Loving yourself enough to be who you are and finding another person to love you for who you are.
 
Last edited:
UNCatTech said:
When did righteousness become a biological variable.
Click to expand...
It hasn't. Two separate things.
UNCatTech said:
Also, many scholars of theology will disagree with you on this being biblical.
Click to expand...
Agree. Over the last decade or so, especially, there has been some interesting reinterpretations of the Bible.
UNCatTech said:
But we all know you, you take any opportunity you have to demonstrating your bigotry toward LBGTQ people. While I know you will disagree and claim you are not a bigot, your post over the years tell the true story.
Click to expand...
That's because you have a "You are either with us or you are against us" approach to LGBTQ topics, not because I have any kind of dislike or bigotry toward LGBTQ people.
UNCatTech said:
Additionally, the Bible is only relevant to those who believe. It has no bearing in the lives of those that don't believe. So to claim something is biblical is not a valid argument.
Click to expand...
I'm not arguing the Bible is right. I'm saying that his interpretation of the Bible is correct.
 
4thgenheel said:
according to whom? there are tons of biblical scholars who see it very differently.
Click to expand...
Those "new" interpretations, not coincidentally, have started to gain steam as societal pressures have grown as religion/churches have found themselves struggling to remain relevant. It's not much different than when Jesus remade the God of the Old Testament into something socially tenable. Jesus realized that we, as a society, can't go around killing our children for back talk or killing our neighbors for working on Saturday.

I don't remember the exact topic, but James Talarico had a new Biblical interpretation that made me laugh out loud.
4thgenheel said:
of course you chose to ignore @breepf 's point about that earlier itt.
Click to expand...
I didn't ignore it. I just didn't reply.
 
Last edited:
ZenMode said:
Those "new" interpretations, not coincidentally, have started to gain steam as societal pressures have grown and religion/churches have found themselves struggling to remain relevant. It's not much different than when Jesus remade the God of the Old Testament into something socially tenable. Jesus realized that we, as a society, can't go around killing our children for back talk or killing our neighbors for working on Saturday.

I don't remember the exact topic, but James Talarico had a new Biblical interpretation that made me laugh out loud.

I didn't ignore it. I just didn't reply.
Click to expand...
uhhhhh, no.

various metaphorical / allegorical interpretations of biblical text are not remotely new. metaphorical interpretation is literally ancient.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top