JD Vance Catch-all

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 956
  • Views: 33K
  • Politics 
CFordUNC said:
Guess Republicans are of the “drag for me but not for thee” mantra, huh?
Click to expand...
Actually, Repubs think dressing in drag is perfectly acceptable IF the person is making fun of trans people. Being a “real” trans person is unacceptable.

Also, the Repubs will give you a pass if you say you used to be trans but now denounce that lifestyle. It’s kinda like w religious zealot Repubs. Just tell them you used to be a child rapist pedophile Democrat but now you see the light and hate those people and love Trump. Then you’ll be good.
 
Delta74 said:
Actually, Repubs think dressing in drag is perfectly acceptable IF the person is making fun of trans people. Being a “real” trans person is unacceptable.

Also, the Repubs will give you a pass if you say you used to be trans but now denounce that lifestyle. It’s kinda like w religious zealot Repubs. Just tell them you used to be a child rapist pedophile Democrat but now you see the light and hate those people and love Trump. Then you’ll be good.
Click to expand...
As Metallica would say, Sad But True.
 
The first photo could be passed off as frat house hijinks - second one is much more damaging because he looks pretty into it. Making fun of women is one thing - wanting to be like one is a whole other matter.
 
Zoo_View said:
I’d rather Hillary Clinton (and Bill) just disappear.
Click to expand...
Yeah I understand this logic. There are half a dozen rising Democrat stars I'd replace them with or even other established ones. The DNC is still an old boys club though so..
 


[Granholm is the Energy Secretary, but you know, Energy, Agriculture, not many folks keep up with the cabinet beyond a few key spots]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top