Latin America Politics General Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter CRHeel94
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 101
  • Views: 2K
  • Politics 
Watching the white people vote yesterday helps explain fascism in Europe in the 1930s. 😎
You think I'm going to argue with you about that? It explains a lot more than fascism in the 1930s. There are hundreds of small town all across the American South that used to have lovely swimming pools, which they closed and filled in rather than desegregate. That is basically the story of American politics at the moment.
 
Watching the Latino vote yesterday helps explain authoritarianism in Latin America.
Better explained by the U.S. constantly overthrowing democratically elected leaders and supporting strongmen.

Unless you’re saying Latinos have some kind of genetic predisposition towards authoritarian leaders. In which case…woof.
 
Better explained by the U.S. constantly overthrowing democratically elected leaders and supporting strongmen.

Unless you’re saying Latinos have some kind of genetic predisposition towards authoritarian leaders. In which case…woof.
Of course it's not a genetic predisposition. Yes, I'm well aware of US foreign policy. Mostly it was a sardonic comment; to the extent that I meant anything by it, it would be more like, "when you grow up in an environment mostly governed by different flavors of authoritarianism, maybe you aren't as turned off by authoritarians as people who grew up in a democracy"
 
Of course it's not a genetic predisposition. Yes, I'm well aware of US foreign policy. Mostly it was a sardonic comment; to the extent that I meant anything by it, it would be more like, "when you grow up in an environment mostly governed by different flavors of authoritarianism, maybe you aren't as turned off by authoritarians as people who grew up in a democracy"
I don’t think most of the Latino voters who voted for Trump grew up in an authoritarian environment.
 
I don’t think most of the Latino voters who voted for Trump grew up in an authoritarian environment.
Not necessarily "grew up" but it's a frame of reference for them politically. But more importantly, it was a one-liner. You know full well that when I want to express a considered idea, it's not usually in the form of a single sentence.
 
Better explained by the U.S. constantly overthrowing democratically elected leaders and supporting strongmen.

Unless you’re saying Latinos have some kind of genetic predisposition towards authoritarian leaders. In which case…woof.
I'm not super, but if anything, I think the point was that Latinos may have a *cultural* predisposition towards strongmen due to their history, not a *genetic* predisposition. And while there's no doubt that US meddling bears a lot of the blame for that, it's not the whole explanation. Machismo is a real thing. Not that it isn't insurmountable (see: Mexico electing a female president).
 
I'm not super, but if anything, I think the point was that Latinos may have a *cultural* predisposition towards strongmen due to their history, not a *genetic* predisposition. And while there's no doubt that US meddling bears a lot of the blame for that, it's not the whole explanation. Machismo is a real thing. Not that it isn't insurmountable (see: Mexico electing a female president).
I guess I just don’t see the point of pointing that out. Like the weeping and gnashing of teeth from liberals about how we’re just a racist country and that’s why Harris lost. It makes it seem inevitable when you attribute things to culture.

Latino culture is no more or less authoritarian than American culture or European culture.
 
I guess I just don’t see the point of pointing that out. Like the weeping and gnashing of teeth from liberals about how we’re just a racist country and that’s why Harris lost. It makes it seem inevitable when you attribute things to culture.

Latino culture is no more or less authoritarian than American culture or European culture.
I don’t really disagree with you. Just trying to clarify that I didn’t think super was referring a genetic thing and that there are genuine cultural differences that could have played a role.
 
I don’t really disagree with you. Just trying to clarify that I didn’t think super was referring a genetic thing and that there are genuine cultural differences that could have played a role.

Yeah its called Catholicism.

The Anglo-Vatican divide has been raging for centuries.
 
Yeah its called Catholicism.

The Anglo-Vatican divide has been raging for centuries.


Well, actually it is called Caudillismo.

 
Well, actually it is called Caudillismo.


A conservative Catholic aristocratic culture is what fuels Caudillismo.
 
You think I'm going to argue with you about that? It explains a lot more than fascism in the 1930s. There are hundreds of small town all across the American South that used to have lovely swimming pools, which they closed and filled in rather than desegregate. That is basically the story of American politics at the moment.

It was just a reflex reaction. Just a bit sensitive when I see pundits trying to pin this on the erosion of the Latino vote.

Paine actually summed it quite nicely.

Latino culture is no more or less authoritarian than American culture or European culture.
 
It was just a reflex reaction. Just a bit sensitive when I see pundits trying to pin this on the erosion of the Latino vote.

Paine actually summed it quite nicely.

Latino culture is no more or less authoritarian than American culture or European culture.
1. I was just making a sardonic joke. I thought your reply was in the same vein. I didn't take offense. What you said was entirely appropriate.
2. It was in some measure because of the erosion of the Latino vote. But of course, the Latino vote is complex. Many "Latinos" are third generation and are Latino in the same way that I am Swedish. We just don't have special categories for Swedes.
3. As usual, white men were the main culprits.
4. If I offended you, I apologize. I thought that people know me well enough that they wouldn't read much into it. But if not, well that's my bad. I was obviously frustrated (still am).

I hope you know that you're one of my favorite posters, and have been for a long time. I've told you that but of course it's easy to forget who says what on a message board with so many pseudonyms. I see myself as a friend to all developing world countries (or, in CR's case, fairly developed) and peoples, and I want to be the best friend I can.

Also, one last point: Latino culture isn't intrinsically more or less authoritarian, but there can be temporal variation, right? Like, Germans are pretty anti-authoritarian these days, and German art/music certainly is. And that, ahem, wasn't always the case. Same with Spain. Since the 1960s, American culture has been really consistently anti-authoritarian, but that appears not to be true any more -- if only because our "culture" is now created in large measure by visible trolls on social media. In 15 years we might be making these jokes in reverse.
 

That would make sense if this was an election between a capitalist and a socialist. Kamala Harris ran to the right of Biden on economic issues and lost.

Hispanic men want money in their pockets, just like working people everywhere else.
 
That would make sense if this was an election between a capitalist and a socialist. Kamala Harris ran to the right of Biden on economic issues and lost.

Hispanic men want money in their pockets, just like working people everywhere else.
 
Back
Top