Mass Shooting & Gun Violence | LDS Church Attacked

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 68K
  • Politics 
theel4life said:
Click to expand...


Also two counts of second-degree murder and eight counts of cruelty to children. I get the cruelty to children would be the injured kids but not sure why they were only two counts of second-degree murder when there were four dead bodies. Maybe because two of them were kids or two of them were educators and there's some state-specific enhancement?
 
CarolinaFever said:
Yes, let's not try to do anything at all that could make them less easier to carry out, and give people a better chance to survive, like getting rid of weapons of war that only have one purpose, to kill as many people as fast as possible and as easy as possible.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but on the other side you have Harris who vows to…not cut social security benefits. So, gotta go with the team that shrugs when dozens of kindergartners get massacred.
 
lawtig02 said:
At this point, I don’t really care if these guns are “that” powerful, or if you need them to hunt wild pigs, or whatever. They’re used in such a massively disproportionate number of mass killings that they need to be taken off the market immediately, if for no other reason than to slow down the copycats. That’s no where close to enough, of course, but it is literally insane to me that we still allow these particular guns to be sold in this country.
Click to expand...
There is no reason at all for a citizen to own a military grade weapon. The militia nutjobs who think they need the same weaponry as the US Army in case the evil government tries to subdue them will argue that they can't protect themselves. But unfortunately for them they are outmanned by the military. I have yet to hear anyone else attempt to make an argument as to why they need these weapons, other than "you can't take away my stuff."
 
I knew as soon as they figured out where the gun came from the parents were in trouble. The Crumbley's going to jail in Michigan set the standard
 
finesse said:
AR-15s are considered hunting rifles by many. I don't think much of it from what I've heard. It's underpowered, doesn't have great range or great accuracy compared to real hunting rifle. They are good for wasting a lot of ammo and playing Army on weekends I guess.

As a side note, it came out of the work Eugene Stoner did at Fort Benning and targeted at Vietnam. It was a lighter weapon with a smaller caliber ammunition which meant the smaller ARVN soldier could carry it easier and carry more ammo. The accuracy and range didn't matter as much since this was much shorter ranges than the M-14 that was designed for European battle fields. It also met with combat doctrine at the time which taught that killing a soldier took out one man, wound one took out him and two men to take him to the aid station. Not quite sure that they grasped the mentality of the Viet Cong.
Click to expand...

Yeah I’m not a hunter but I know a lot of people who do hunt, and they don’t use the AR for anything other than feral hogs. Apparently it is considered inhumane to hunt with an AR because the bullets don’t kill the animals immediately…they were designed to have a higher chance of wounding for exactly the reason you stated.
 
2ManyBlueCups said:
Yeah I’m not a hunter but I know a lot of people who do hunt, and they don’t use the AR for anything other than feral hogs. Apparently it is considered inhumane to hunt with an AR because the bullets don’t kill the animals immediately…they were designed to have a higher chance of wounding for exactly the reason you stated.
Click to expand...
Murdering animals for fun is inhumane
 
Calheel said:
It seems like Vance is walking the walk there. He is saying that you can’t stop shootings so act accordingly.

I mean his words are outrageous. But that particular photo doesn’t really seem to be a gotcha.
Click to expand...
Still incredibly lame.
 
Calheel said:
It seems like Vance is walking the walk there. He is saying that you can’t stop shootings so act accordingly.

I mean his words are outrageous. But that particular photo doesn’t really seem to be a gotcha.
Click to expand...
If he’s gonna walk the walk, I eagerly await his proposal for government funding for each individual to purchase a personalized bulletproof glass shield.
 
EyeballKid said:
If he’s gonna walk the walk, I eagerly await his proposal for government funding for each individual to purchase a personalized bulletproof glass shield.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I mean it is a bit like Marie Antoinette telling the poor to eat cake. If we could all afford our own personal security team and bullet proof glass, guns would be less scary.
 
Calheel said:
It seems like Vance is walking the walk there. He is saying that you can’t stop shootings so act accordingly.

I mean his words are outrageous. But that particular photo doesn’t really seem to be a gotcha.
Click to expand...
He has the luxury of taking precautions not available to others. And needed measures could be taken to protect others except the people who can affect that change - politicians like him - won’t do it in order to retain power.
That’s the problem I see when I look at the photo.
 
SmilingJack said:
Horseshit toxic masculinity leans you in that misogynistic direction. Did you get taught by your Diddy to kill babies and be a man. Why is that thought in your own head. Therapy is good.
Click to expand...
You insult me. I'm a misanthrope. I believe in equal opportunity to hate on someone's lame ass regardless of their sex.

No, I wasn't taught anything like that by my daddy. He was killed in a construction accident when I was 13 months. My granddaddy didn't either although we did eat many needed meals provided by a rod or gun.

Why don't you contemplate why you would say something like that to someone you don't know while you have coitus with yourself?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top