I agree and I was referring to the man hating feminist statements in her manifesto. I'm currently unaware of any evidence indicating the shooter is transgender (I said perhaps). That was based on unfounded early reports. We'll see what the evidence shows.
www.washingtonexaminer.com
dccrimefacts.substack.com
Ffs, dude…I mean, keep ignoring the fact that in several cities it’s been shown to be relatively inefficient and costly, and keep whining about progressives. It’s like talking to brick fucking wall.The opposition to ShotSpotter has a lot to do with the ACAB bandwagon. In fact, ShotSpotter is one of the favorite targets of anti-policing activists:
Johnson threatened to veto it, but did not. Nonetheless, even if there is an opening for ShotSpotter going forward, the end of the contract is a victory that anti-policing and anti-surveillance activists in the city had been working toward for years. Their achievement provides a potential blueprint for other cities trying to roll back the use of ShotSpotter and other high-tech crime “solutions” in favor of investments in underprivileged communities.
How Chicago Organizers Managed To Rid the City of ShotSpotter
The controversial police surveillance tech is often inaccurate, according to research that allowed activists to launch a fact-based campaign and a potential model for organizers in other cities.nextcity.org
I don't see many downsides to alerting the police about gunshots, but some people do.
It is a brick wall.
Yeah, I've read (what is purported to be) the manifesto.
Ffs, dude…I mean, keep ignoring the fact that in several cities it’s been shown to be relatively inefficient and costly, and keep whining about progressives. It’s like talking to brick fucking wall.The opposition to ShotSpotter has a lot to do with the ACAB bandwagon. In fact, ShotSpotter is one of the favorite targets of anti-policing activists:
Johnson threatened to veto it, but did not. Nonetheless, even if there is an opening for ShotSpotter going forward, the end of the contract is a victory that anti-policing and anti-surveillance activists in the city had been working toward for years. Their achievement provides a potential blueprint for other cities trying to roll back the use of ShotSpotter and other high-tech crime “solutions” in favor of investments in underprivileged communities.
How Chicago Organizers Managed To Rid the City of ShotSpotter
The controversial police surveillance tech is often inaccurate, according to research that allowed activists to launch a fact-based campaign and a potential model for organizers in other cities.nextcity.org
I don't see many downsides to alerting the police about gunshots, but some people do.
Didn't I already say that it isn't a solution for every city? But it is a valuable tool for some? So what are we arguing about?
No, you said it’s not a one size fits all solution—but you’ve consistently implied that it should be part of a comprehensive package in Durham (despite its reported ineffectiveness) and other cities, and you’ve blamed progressives for the fact that many cities have looked at the data and decided not to use it.
I'm just going with what the Durham police chief said. He's probably more in tune with crime there than either one of us. And I provided you with a link showing that anti-police activists are fighting shot spotter across the country. Like, they are saying in their own words "this is part of our anti-police strategy" and you are simply ignoring it. Brick wall indeed.
Agreed on frontier towns. I guess I'm referring more to Hollywood Westerns.
That’s my point. Thanks. You keep whining about activists instead of taking into account the evidence that city leaders across the country have access to. It’s not as though these programs haven’t been pilot-tested and studied. Instead, it must be the lousy progressive activists.
Yup, I guess we should just ignore the activists who state in their own words that they want to get rid of ShotSpotter nationwide in their effort to abolish policing.
Maybe. But death by AK-47 is so much more dramatic.
The overt racism, discussion of other neo Nazi affiliated killers, and her use is the term "saint" to describe them is pretty strong evidence that she was influenced by the Terrorgram Collective, which is a very right wing Nazi militant accelerationist organization.
That’s probably why it’s already fallen out of the news cycle. That’s how you know it’s real and being covered up by the media.
Where did you encounter those reports? From which of the media diet that you admitted to did this misinformation come?