JCTarheel82
Honored Member
- Messages
- 872
That we even have discussions in this country around how to characterize a "true" school shooting is a sad commentary on American life and society.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bullets from a gun don't hurt only when fired from the barrel of a mass shooter. Students have to be afraid of the violence that you're describing, either as the intended victims or as potential bystanders.
The fact that you feel it is dishonest because it doesn't conform to some arbitrary standard that you set based on how grossly obscene the violence in our culture has become is, if anything, a part of the problem rather than a good faith effort to find any type of solution, and you should feel bad for posting this.
Real solutions would address both.Focusing on solutions that may save White kids while ignoring the people that are 18 times more likely to be victims of gun violence is the predictable result of the intentional dishonesty surrounding the characterization of school shootings by the media and activists.
I doubt any of those would have helped with this girl but would possibly make a dent in the gangland type shootings.Real solutions would address both.
A good start:
Federal registration of all firearms
Universal background checks
Strict liability for gun owners
High minimum sentences for possession of unregistered firearms
I’m fine with all of that but you know it is a non-starter for both conservatives and progressives. We’re paralyzed in this cycle for the foreseeable future.Real solutions would address both.
A good start:
Federal registration of all firearms
Universal background checks
Strict liability for gun owners
High minimum sentences for possession of unregistered firearms
I think you’ve miscalculated the progressive position. As for conservatives, yes. They would fight this tooth and nail and not because it infringes on their rights at all.I’m fine with all of that but you know it is a non-starter for both conservatives and progressives. We’re paralyzed in this cycle for the foreseeable future.
I think if parents knew they could be facing bankruptcy or felony charges for not taking proper measures to secure a gun, they would have do so. Admittedly I don’t know how accessible the gun was in this particular case.I doubt any of those would have helped with this girl but would possibly make a dent in the gangland type shootings.
I think it's just one of those things that no one thinks is going to happen to them.I think if parents knew they could be facing bankruptcy or felony charges for not taking proper measures to secure a gun, they would have do so. Admittedly I don’t know how accessible the gun was in this particular case.
Look at the article I posted a couple of pages ago about the Durham DA refusing to prosecute felons in possession of illegal firearms.I think you’ve miscalculated the progressive position. As for conservatives, yes. They would fight this tooth and nail and not because it infringes on their rights at all.
That same article notes that the Wake County DA, who is a Democrat, and the Orange County DA, who is a Democrat elected primarily by residents of Chapel Hill and Carrboro, prioritize prosecuting felons in possession of illegal firearms. Dropping felony gun charges doesn't seem like a universal policy of progressive DA's.Look at the article I posted a couple of pages ago about the Durham DA refusing to prosecute felons in possession of illegal firearms.
Given it’s a topic of such interest for you, how were you unable to discern that the shooter was not trans?15 yr old female anti male lefty feminist (perhaps trans) with a manifesto Story will fade as it doesn’t meet the chosen narrative (like the trans Nashville shooting) Media wanted it to be a male, MAGA Christian Nationalist shooter.
I think it's just one of those things that no one thinks is going to happen to them.
Seems like you’re focusing on the wrong thing and it smells like bullshit.Most of them involve people who were shot (not killed) and were not students. But they should be treated differently because they are different phenomena with different root causes that require different actions to prevent. An active shooter hell bent on killing as many kids as possible is different from a drug dealer fighting with a rival in the parking lot outside of a basketball game. Gang violence is different than random rampages.
According to Everytown, Black teens are 18 times more likely to die from gun violence than White teens. Yet they aren’t dying en masse from mass shootings at schools. Failing to differentiate can lead to solutions that benefit more affluent groups and ignore the root causes of violence in disadvantaged communities.
This is one issue that I will sadly admit that I have completely given up on. There is simply no way in our current political and cultural situation that there is ever going to be any kind of significant gun control legislation passed. In fact, not only are (mostly) red states adamantly refusing to look at even mild gun control measures, but in many of these states there are now concealed carry and even open carry laws for civilians to walk around and look and feel tough and safe, like the Wild West. If the cold-blooded murder of 20 kids between the ages of 6 and 7 at Sandy Hook didn't move the needle on this issue then nothing will, and every school shooting since has just proven it. There's always an excuse not to do anything substantive, and it seems clear that as a society too many of us have decided that the occasional murder of schoolkids is simply the price we all have to pay for our precious Second Amendment rights to own lots and lots of pew pew pews. And I don't see that changing in my lifetime, unfortunately.
True, but Durham is much more progressive than Wake and Orange doesn't have the crime problem that Durham has. Durham also got rid of ShotSpotter despite pleas from the Mayor, police chief, and many residents to keep it. Point being that while the right is vehemently opposed to any new gun safety legislation regardless of how reasonable it might be, some on the left are vehemently opposed to using existing tools and laws to reduce gun crime.That same article notes that the Wake County DA, who is a Democrat, and the Orange County DA, who is a Democrat elected primarily by residents of Chapel Hill and Carrboro, prioritize prosecuting felons in possession of illegal firearms. Dropping felony gun charges doesn't seem like a universal policy of progressive DA's.
True, but Durham is much more progressive than Wake and Orange doesn't have the crime problem that Durham has. Durham also got rid of ShotSpotter despite pleas from the Mayor, police chief, and many residents to keep it. Point being that while the right is vehemently opposed to any new gun safety legislation regardless of how reasonable it might be, some on the left are vehemently opposed to using existing tools and laws to reduce gun crime.
To be fair, ShotSpotter was highly controversial and its effectiveness was questionable. Shootings actually increased in Durham during the year ShotSpotter was piloted, and something like 90% of ShotSpotter reports couldn’t be confirmed by police when they investigated. Also, many residents thought it led to over-policing in black neighborhoods.True, but Durham is much more progressive than Wake and Orange doesn't have the crime problem that Durham has. Durham also got rid of ShotSpotter despite pleas from the Mayor, police chief, and many residents to keep it. Point being that while the right is vehemently opposed to any new gun safety legislation regardless of how reasonable it might be, some on the left are vehemently opposed to using existing tools and laws to reduce gun crime.