Matt Gaetz Catch-All

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 123
  • Views: 3K
  • Politics 
Link: https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/01/politics/matt-gaetz-photos-women/index.html

This is an article from 2021 that alleges Matt Gaetz showed photos of nude women, with whom he is alleged to have "slept," to other Representatives while on the Floor of the House of Representatives. Anyone else think this was a calculated move on the part of Gaetz to ensnare other lawmakers into being a part of his little world of statutory rape and trafficking of underage women? Once the other lawmakers realized they were tangentially ensnared in Gaetz's particular flavor of debauchery, then they would be far less likely to publicly denounce him.
 
Why has the Justice system not charged this guy?
What I have read is that the DoJ reached a conclusion that those who had first hand knowledge of Gaetz's particular perversions were of a sort as to make the unsympathetic witnesses. The old problem of criminals (other than the priests) seldom enlist nuns as co-conspirators.
 

I don’t believe they would stand up to him in a public vote, so trying to derail the nomination before it comes to that?
 

I don’t believe they would stand up to him in a public vote, so trying to derail the nomination before it comes to that?
Recess appointment incoming!

Pbs Nature Dog GIF by Nature on PBS
 
Recess appointment incoming!

Pbs Nature Dog GIF by Nature on PBS
Yeah, I've read some articles that claim that Trump is deliberately choosing these wackos/criminals/rapists as a test case to see just how much control he has over Congress, in this particular case the Senate. And if he can't get them through the Senate he'll just do what you said and appoint them anyway as a sign of his total power over the government. And I'm sure that any GOP Senator who won't vote to confirm any of these nominees will be immediately added to a "shit list" of Republicans who will be challenged in their next primary for reelection by a diehard Trumper.
 
Yeah, I've read some articles that claim that Trump is deliberately choosing these wackos/criminals/rapists as a test case to see just how much control he has over Congress, in this particular case the Senate. And if he can't get them through the Senate he'll just do what you said and appoint them anyway as a sign of his total power over the government. And I'm sure that any GOP Senator who won't vote to confirm any of these nominees will be immediately added to a "shit list" of Republicans who will be challenged in their next primary for reelection by a diehard Trumper.
These fucking idiots have to realize that a) with the country in the crapper, no primary challenge backed by Trump will succeed; and b) avoiding it will do nothing because they will lose in the general with the country in the crapper, even in red states.

Clearly the smart play by the GOP Senators is to stand up to Trump. Unfortunately they are stupid people.
 
These fucking idiots have to realize that a) with the country in the crapper, no primary challenge backed by Trump will succeed; and b) avoiding it will do nothing because they will lose in the general with the country in the crapper, even in red states.

Clearly the smart play by the GOP Senators is to stand up to Trump. Unfortunately they are stupid people.
They had the perfect chance four years ago. They could have gotten rid of the Trump problem for good and put themselves on the right side of history.
 
. . .. And I'm sure that any GOP Senator who won't vote to confirm any of these nominees will be immediately added to a "shit list" of Republicans who will be challenged in their next primary for reelection by a diehard Trumper.
Or alternatively, receive a plain envelope with no return address, but a Moscow postmark, containing a memory stick with a video of said Senator engaging in activities with some underage boy/girl that said Senator would not prefer not to be used in campaign ads in his next re-election campaign.
 
Last edited:
Seems like another money and time wasting political witchhunt. I so hate our ridiculous 2 party system....it makes people stupid
 
I was thinking this morning about how Fox News has essentially given Republicans cover for bad actions. And predictably if bad actors aren’t punished you will get more and more bad actors. That is where we are and where we are going.
 
These fucking idiots have to realize that a) with the country in the crapper, no primary challenge backed by Trump will succeed; and b) avoiding it will do nothing because they will lose in the general with the country in the crapper, even in red states.

Clearly the smart play by the GOP Senators is to stand up to Trump. Unfortunately they are stupid people.
I doubt that many Trump-backed Senate challengers in 2026 lose even if the economy goes into the shitter that quickly.

MAGAts will blame the Democrats, the Deep State, and “establishment” Republicans for any crap that happens.

They’ll turn out to vote for fellow MAGAts against any Republicans who vote or work against Trump and Trump’s nominees.
 
Seems like another money and time wasting political witchhunt. I so hate our ridiculous 2 party system....it makes people stupid
Given your dislike of the two-party system, I’m curious…..do you:
  • Support the Electoral College system?
  • Support the federal bi-cameral system?
  • Support how the US Senate is apportioned?
  • Support how the House is apportioned?
 
I was thinking this morning about how Fox News has essentially given Republicans cover for bad actions. And predictably if bad actors aren’t punished you will get more and more bad actors. That is where we are and where we are going.
I've thought for a good while that either Fox News (and other blatant right-wing networks) goes, or our democracy and historic political stability goes. The problem is that any attempt at this point to do something about Fox will only lead to right-wing outrage and even violence, and Fox will just hide behind the freedom of the press, freedom of speech defenses. So we're pretty much screwed on that front.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top