- Messages
- 29,156
"Compliance" is probably reached by everyone based on the squishy language actually involved:23 better than 12 but it needs to be all 31 - in compliance.
2014-2023: "... the guideline, created at a NATO summit in Wales in 2014, said members that had yet to reach 2% would “aim to move towards the 2% guideline within a decade with a view to meeting their NATO Capability Targets and filling NATO’s capability shortfalls.”
2024 this was updated to more of a commitment, albeit one with no deadline: "... NATO members agreed to firmer language related to the 2% target in 2023, formally declaring that “we make an enduring commitment to invest at least 2% of our Gross Domestic Product (GDP) annually on defence.” Lagadec said that “arguably for the first time the Allies HAVE made a hard commitment to reaching 2% (indeed, to reaching at least 2%) rather than merely ‘trying to get there if possible.’” He noted, though, that even this stronger declaration “doesn’t provide a deadline” to hit 2%. ..."
I am confident that every NATO country could reasonably claim compliance (to the extent the concept is even applicable) with the "aim to move ... with a view to meet" standard. And now that there is an actual standard, I assume that the lack of a deadline will give plenty of "compliance" wiggle room to the nations who have yet to meet the target.