Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul

Calheel said:
Which is what everyone predicted.

But we also predicted he would throw a punch in one of those later rounds. Or that Jake Paul would be more aggressive. Instead, we got 16 minutes of dancing.
Click to expand...
Paul laid back out of respect and a bit of fear.
He probably could have knocked him out at any point after the 2nd round.
 
That was embarrassing for Mike. He was gassed in the second round and could never recover.

That was his last fight and it was a sad way to go out.
 
IMG_0364.jpeg

Netflix better get this fixed before Christmas. If they thought there were a lot of eyeballs on last nights fight, there will be twice that many trying to watch those NFL games on Christmas day.
 
A
dukeman92 said:
IMG_0364.jpeg

Netflix better get this fixed before Christmas. If they thought there were a lot of eyeballs on last nights fight, there will be twice that many trying to watch those NFL games on Christmas day.
Click to expand...
Will there be 280 million viewers on Christmas Day?
 
Paul carried him. Could have ended it early. WWE
Bigs23 said:
A

Will there be 280 million viewers on Christmas Day?
Click to expand...
No way by an order of magnitude at least. They’re estimating 10 million streams on Christmas Day. I saw someone else worrying that this might happen when they show WWE Raw which is even funnier. Raw prob gets 3 million streams tops.
 
I had the same issue with the streaming feed on my TV through my Roku. I ended up streaming it on my phone and casting it to the Roku. Didn't have any issues doing it that way.
 
dcphx said:
Michael Irvin has apparently said that the Tyson/Paul contract barred Tyson from body shots and his trademark uppercut.
Click to expand...
If that is true and they allowed legal betting on that fight (which was sanctioned,) somebody should be charged for fixing the fight. That contract should be subpoenaed. The TDLR (sanctioning body) should also be investigated since it was sanctioned as a professional fight and not as an exhibition.
 
Last edited:
farce© said:
If that is true and they allowed legal betting on that fight (which was sanctioned,) somebody should be charged for fixing the fight. That contract should be subpoenaed. The TDLR (sanctioning body) should also be investigated since it was sanctioned as a professional fight and not as an exhibition.
Click to expand...
I don’t believe that.

“Then I heard some people talking about they put that in the contract. He couldn't body and then uppercut. Like, how can you put that in a fight contract?"

He heard some people. It’s not true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top