NC Supreme Court race - Riggs ahead +734 | NC Supremes issue temporary stay

  • Thread starter Thread starter rodoheel
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 362
  • Views: 11K
  • Politics 
Help me to understand this: if X amounts of votes are thrown out in the election contest of Alison Riggs and Jefferson Griffin, citing the ballots are irregular, the why are the same "irregular" ballots not thrown out for all contest in the same district. Perhaps, the rejected ballots may cause other (R) candidates to lose?
As best as I can understand the logic, none of the candidates in those other elections complained (nor would it have likely made a difference). That appears to be the logic for the other counties, too. Riggs didn’t complain about the Republican ballots.

In retrospect, Riggs should have launched a prophylactic objection to every ballot in NC on the same grounds as Griffin.
 
As best as I can understand the logic, none of the candidates in those other elections complained (nor would it have likely made a difference). That appears to be the logic for the other counties, too. Riggs didn’t complain about the Republican ballots.

In retrospect, Riggs should have launched a prophylactic objection to every ballot in NC on the same grounds as Griffin.
I think I said this earlier but without the reference to condoms. 😎
 
As best as I can understand the logic, none of the candidates in those other elections complained (nor would it have likely made a difference). That appears to be the logic for the other counties, too. Riggs didn’t complain about the Republican ballots.

In retrospect, Riggs should have launched a prophylactic objection to every ballot in NC on the same grounds as Griffin.
Yeah, it's simply a procedural thing. There's an election challenge in front of the court, filed by Griffin. They are resolving that challenge.

That doesn't justify any of that bullshit.
 
Back
Top