StoneColdHeel
Legend of ZZL
- Messages
- 5,807
I feel like this will go to court for some reason and Paramount will lose because anything Trump is for almost always loses in court.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe, but that is not what I am talking about.Yeah, Netflix would be a lot better for DC and the HBO shows. A lot more people have Netflix than Paramount+. I don't see enough people adding Paramount+ because of the deal for them to make their money back from buying WB Discovery. You know Paramount is going to raise the subscription price, too.
www.forbes.com
NPR was reporting that the new Paramount bid was backed (sweetened) by Middle East money-don’t remember which country.
Netflix dropped out after saying the Paramount bid was superior and blah blah. Eff the Ellisons.
I’m sure. I guess the only hope is that in a couple years time, when the Trump presidency has become too toxic to be associated with, this all comes crashing down.NPR was reporting that the new Paramount bid was backed (sweetened) by Middle East money-don’t remember which country.
It always boggles my mind that they can find banks to lend into deals that are obviously shit. I get the mismatched incentives of bankers and banks, but come on. What is the interest coverage ratio on this thing?It’s crazy. Paramount is acquiring a company 10x its size by market cap and loading it up with $90 billion of debt.
Netflix can step aside and wait to snap up the pieces when this thing collapses under its own weight. But in the meantime, CNN (which Netflix wasn’t even going to buy) and CBS will merge into some sort of mini-Fox I guess.
CBS has long wanted to acquire CNN to gain a cable news foothold. It may be that most of the CBS News teams and all of Trump’s enemies in front of the camera at CNN will be out.
When some of those banks are Middle East sovereign funds, the mystery becomes a little clearer.It always boggles my mind that they can find banks to lend into deals that are obviously shit. I get the mismatched incentives of bankers and banks, but come on. What is the interest coverage ratio on this thing?
TBD but one reason WB is on the market is its current interest coverage below 1.0x (perhaps well below depending on the analyst). It appears WB may currently have interest coverage of about 0.73x with between $35-$40B of borrowed money (about $65B in liabilities). Hard to see how the combined Paramount/WB can carry more than twice the borrowed debt and survive. The financing must have crazy synergy and similar add-backs to EBITDA etc. (that will have to result in massive layoffs in the combined companies) to stay in compliance in the near term, but I would expect pretty steep step-ups in minimum interest coverage for a deal this out of whack.It always boggles my mind that they can find banks to lend into deals that are obviously shit. I get the mismatched incentives of bankers and banks, but come on. What is the interest coverage ratio on this thing?
What types of step-ups?TBD but one reason WB is on the market is its current interest coverage below 1.0x (perhaps well below depending on the analyst). It appears WB may currently have interest coverage of about 0.73x with between $35-$40B of borrowed money (about $65B in liabilities). Hard to see how the combined Paramount/WB can carry more than twice the borrowed debt and survive. The financing must have crazy synergy and similar add-backs to EBITDA etc. (that will have to result in massive layoffs in the combined companies) to stay in compliance in the near term, but I would expect pretty steep step-ups in minimum interest coverage for a deal this out of whack.
Well, yes, in this case. But I was talking in general. Lots of PE deals that were obviously bad went belly up, with banks often taking big writedowns.When some of those banks are Middle East sovereign funds, the mystery becomes a little clearer.