Paramount Considering Settling Trump '60 Minutes' Lawsuit / FCC demands 60 Minutes footage

  • Thread starter Thread starter rodoheel
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 44
  • Views: 929
  • Politics 
What specifically did 69nlinutes supposedly do? Anyone got Cliff notes. I might take a dive later but can't now.
 
Seems like it would be important to compare this to an unedited speech or interview with Trump. Apples to apples, you know.
 
They edited an interview to fit the time allotted in their programming. Even if they spliced her words together to change what she actually said, calling it “election interference”is quite a stretch. But we live in Trumpworld now, so bad faith is the order of the day.
 
I am not saying they tried to influence election. But while there are time constraints associated with the TV broadcast, not so with the website. There would be no reason not to publish entire interview on website that I can think of. As for editing trump, I am not sure it would be possible to edit an interview with him to make him appear coherent.
 
heel79 said:
I am not saying they tried to influence election. But while there are time constraints associated with the TV broadcast, not so with the website. There would be no reason not to publish entire interview on website that I can think of. As for editing trump, I am not sure it would be possible to edit an interview with him to make him appear coherent.
Click to expand...
It's not to render him coherent which I agree is nigh impossible but to cover up how mean, angry, stupid and deranged that he is. There was more media "make up" in his TV spots than on his face.
 
farce© said:
They edited an interview to fit the time allotted in their programming. Even if they spliced her words together to change what she actually said, calling it “election interference”is quite a stretch. But we live in Trumpworld now, so bad faith is the order of the day.
Click to expand...
lol. According to trump her answers to some questions were so bad and infected with word salad that it was going to make her come off as her typical true self which wouldn't look good to voters so they took answers to other questions asked and edited them to apply to the questions she botched in order to prevent her from being her. The left would have you believe it was just to fit a timeline and had nothing to do with making her appear competent.

That's a summary. You can judge for yourself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top