Redistricting | TX map dissent is nuts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Callatoroy
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 233
  • Views: 8K
  • Politics 
nycfan said:
Click to expand...

“… The majority repeatedly derided the Justice Department’s effort to goad Texas into targeting the four districts with non-white majorities — known as “coalition districts.” That effort, Brown said, began on July 7, with a letter from DOJ’s Civil Rights Division that was “challenging to unpack … because it contains so many factual, legal, and typographical errors.”

According to the court, the letter selected the four districts “based entirely on their racial makeup” and was the key factor that spurred Texas Republicans to take up the extraordinary redistricting effort. The bulk of Brown’s 160-page opinion delves into the mindset of the state lawmakers and advisers who drew the new maps, suggesting that their motives clearly aligned with DOJ’s race-based push and that their characterization of the new maps as based only on race-blind partisanship were not believable.…”
 
nycfan said:
“… The majority repeatedly derided the Justice Department’s effort to goad Texas into targeting the four districts with non-white majorities — known as “coalition districts.” That effort, Brown said, began on July 7, with a letter from DOJ’s Civil Rights Division that was “challenging to unpack … because it contains so many factual, legal, and typographical errors.”

According to the court, the letter selected the four districts “based entirely on their racial makeup” and was the key factor that spurred Texas Republicans to take up the extraordinary redistricting effort. The bulk of Brown’s 160-page opinion delves into the mindset of the state lawmakers and advisers who drew the new maps, suggesting that their motives clearly aligned with DOJ’s race-based push and that their characterization of the new maps as based only on race-blind partisanship were not believable.…”
Click to expand...
IMG_1056.jpeg
IMG_1057.jpeg
 
dukeman92 said:
We need more pubs to stand up to him.
Click to expand...
They will probably increasingly do so as we get closer to the end of his term - especially if the 2026 midterms go badly for Pubs. By 2030 or so, it's possible that most Republicans out there will be disclaiming that they ever supported Trump.

(Now, this is not the only possible outcome - if the economy improves and Pubs do better than expected in the midterms, it could re-consolidate Trump's hold on the party. but at least for now, there are increasing signs that he doesn't have the same power to compel intraparty obedience the way he did even 3-4 months ago.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top