RFK Jr, HHs & MAHA | CDC RIF massacre

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 55K
  • Politics 
gtyellowjacket said:
So what you're saying is you now accept the presence of DNA in vaccines? Because that's all I'm saying. If you think I'm saying something else, you're incorrect. If you don't think there is fetal DNA in vaccines, you are also incorrect.
Click to expand...
You are incorrect. Vaccine Ingredients: Fetal Cells

"In order to grow viruses in the lab, cells need to be made into single cell suspensions, meaning they can no longer be grouped together in the form of tissues or organs. As such, vaccines do not contain “parts of fetuses.”

Vaccines also do not contain fetal cells. Once the vaccine viruses are grown in the cells, the next step in the manufacturing process is to purify the vaccine viruses away from the cells and substances used to help cells grow. If you have ever picked blueberries, you can think of this part of the process as similar. While you are picking, you might get some of the blueberry plant — stems, leaves and even branches — in your berry bucket, but to use the berries, you remove all of those things, so your pie contains only the blueberries (and any other ingredients you choose to add).

Plasmid-gate: Debunking the DNA contamination claims in mRNA vaccines | Global Vaccine Data Network

In recent months, the internet has buzzed with a conspiracy theory dubbed "Plasmid-gate." The claim? COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are "contaminated" with residual DNA, which could integrate into human DNA and potentially cause cancer, or even "turbo cancer." These accusations have sparked concerns...
www.globalvaccinedatanetwork.org www.globalvaccinedatanetwork.org

But here’s where the conspiracy starts: During vaccine production, mRNA is synthesised using plasmids—small, circular pieces of DNA in bacteria like E. coli that carry genetic instructions. Once the desired mRNA is produced, the plasmid DNA is removed through purification processes, though tiny amounts of residual DNA may remain. These fragments are highly degraded and non-functional.

Notice not DNA from fetal cells.

Note also that the entire concept of "fetal DNA" is stupid and makes no sense. DNA is DNA. It's a fucking molecule -- a big one (technically many molecules) -- but a molecule nonetheless. In a pregnant woman there can be traces of the embryo's DNA in her blood stream, but that's not "embryonic" DNA. It's just DNA that came from an embryo -- i.e. the one inside her. Otherwise, DNA is just DNA.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
So what you're saying is you now accept the presence of DNA in vaccines? Because that's all I'm saying. If you think I'm saying something else, you're incorrect. If you don't think there is fetal DNA in vaccines, you are also incorrect.
Click to expand...
Dude, we can all see the history of your posts. If you’re going to do the Gish Gallop, at least put some fucking effort into it. To this point, and despite prior experience, I’ve given you the benefit of doubt regarding your ability to understand and your sincerity. Thanks for clarifying you’ve neither.
 
Last edited:
BlooVooDoo said:
Dude, we can all see the history of your posts. If you’re going to do the Gish Gallop, at least put some fucking effort into it. To this point, and despite prior experience, I’ve given you the benefit of doubt regarding your ability to understand and your sincerity. Thanks for clarifying you’ve neither.
Click to expand...
Quote it then. I have consistently said that there are traces of fetal DNA in vaccines. That's what I started saying and that's what I'm still saying.

I'm sure you think you read something else and maybe out of context you did but I would not agree with RFK's statement that there is a lot of fetal material in vaccines.
 
BoonetheAiredale said:
If you're willing to make that link/span across time, then I can definitively say it's not fetal cell dna, it's bacterial cell dna from 4 billion years ago that's just made its way up the chain. There is no fetal to it as there has been an unbroken chain of previous cells since the first cell. We good?
Click to expand...
No. That's pretty silly. The bacterial cells have evolved and mutated pretty significantly in billions of years. The fetal cells today are almost identical if not completely identical to the fetal cells from 60 years ago. Consistency is the one of the main benefits of having a fetal cell line.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
No. That's pretty silly. The bacterial cells have evolved and mutated pretty significantly in billions of years. The fetal cells today are almost identical if not completely identical to the fetal cells from 60 years ago. Consistency is the one of the main benefits of having a fetal cell line.
Click to expand...
But you would have to say that fetuses contain bacterial dna debris and ergo said vaccine has bacterial dna debris? Correct? And if so, how do you pick one as more important than the other? There is no line of demarcation as the fetus contains the parents dna debris and the generation before that and the generation before that. DNA debris has accumulated across time to make a trash dump of DNA debris wouldn't you say?
 
BoonetheAiredale said:
But you would have to say that fetuses contain bacterial dna debris and ergo said vaccine has bacterial dna debris? Correct? And if so, how do you pick one as more important than the other? There is no line of demarcation as the fetus contains the parents dna debris and the generation before that and the generation before that. DNA debris has accumulated across time to make a trash dump of DNA debris wouldn't you say?
Click to expand...
Sure. I'm sure vaccines contain traces of bacterial DNA on an even smaller scale than the traces of fetal DNA that they contain. I suppose both could be true. I think you pick one as being more important or really relevant than the other as the difference between the evolution that would happen in 4,000,000,000 years vs 60 years.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
Sure. I'm sure vaccines contain traces of bacterial DNA on an even smaller scale than the traces of fetal DNA that they contain. I suppose both could be true. I think you pick one as being more important or really relevant than the other as the difference between the evolution that would happen in 4,000,000,000 years vs 60 years.
Click to expand...
Ok let's just go back 3 generations. That a total of 14 sets of DNA debris that made the 15th's debris. Which of those 15 is the most "important" debris, the debris we should focus on? Which one is "really relevant" and why is one more relevant than the other?

So much debris. Kind of like mountain rivers after Hurrican Helene.
 
BoonetheAiredale said:
Ok let's just go back 3 generations. That a total of 14 sets of DNA debris that made the 15th's debris. Which of those 15 is the most "important" debris, the debris we should focus on? Which one is "really relevant" and why is one more relevant than the other?

So much debris. Kind of like mountain rivers after Hurrican Helene.
Click to expand...
I think you're going pretty far off topic here. I think you should tighten up a bit. Do you want to try to ask a relevant question?
 
BoonetheAiredale said:
The topic is dna debris is it not? Is that a relevant question?
Click to expand...
This is where this all started and the original discussion was not about DNA debris but aborted DNA debris.

gtyellowjacket said:
There is some truth to the statement that some vaccines contain aborted fetus debris. A lot is misleading and imprecise. Traces is a better description.
Click to expand...
You want to give a source for that claim? I'm not saying you're wrong but I can't imagine the hows or whys.
 

“Steven J. Hatfill, a virologist and White House adviser during President Donald Trump’s first term who pushed hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for the coronavirus despite what most researchers said was a lack of scientific evidence, has joined the second Trump administration in a senior role at the Department of Health and Human Services.

Hatfill will begin his second week Monday as special adviser in the director’s office at the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, a small agency responsible for preparing the U.S. for disasters such as pandemics and biological and chemical attacks.
An Army biodefense researcher, Hatfill was investigated for years by the Justice Department as a “person of interest” in the 2001 mailing of letters that contained anthrax spores, which killed five people and sickened 17. Hatfill was formally exonerated in 2008, the same year the government paid him $4.6 million to settle his lawsuit in the case.

…
Fauci and other health officials said there was no evidence the drug fought the coronavirus. Navarro and Hatfill repeatedly attacked Fauci in the emails, citing his “outrageous bias” and other alleged mistakes in a battle that was picked up by the news media.

On Saturday, Hatfill repeated his claims that hydroxychloroquine is safe and effective against the coronavirus, contending there are “5,000 controlled, randomized studies” that were peer-reviewed. He said that research has shown the drug reduces mortality rates if given early in the course of the disease. …”
 
www.fiercepharma.com

FDA Commissioner Marty Makary taps Vinay Prasad to head up CBER

In the wake of the high-profile departure of Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., the FDA has a new leader for its Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). | In the wake of the high-profile departure of Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., the FDA has a new leader for its Center for Biologics Evaluation...
www.fiercepharma.com www.fiercepharma.com

Hope nobody wants an updated COVID vaccine any time soon.
 

Dr. Casey Means, Trump's new surgeon general nominee, is RFK Jr. ally and MAHA advocate​

President Trump will nominate Dr. Casey Means, an ally of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and prominent advocate for his agenda, to serve as the U.S. surgeon general, the president announced Wednesday.

www.cbsnews.com

Dr. Casey Means, Trump's new surgeon general nominee, is RFK Jr. ally and MAHA advocate

President Trump said his new pick for surgeon general, Dr. Casey Means, has "impeccable" credentials, after the White House withdrew his earlier nominee.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com
 
C1585856-65BB-46A5-90DD-47E7A59B4362.png

Laura Loomer coming out swinging against Casey Means after she apparently torpedoed the previous pick for surgeon general too. It’ll be interesting to see how much sway she has over the admin and how far Means gets.

Side note: Loomer is 31.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top