Russia - US | Ukraine “peace negotiations”

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 35K
  • Politics 
“What Trump is really trying to do is <insert wishcasting here>. I don’t like the optics/language/attitude, but he’s the only politician willing to talk about <insert fictional problem here>. If you liberals could stop freaking out and give him a chance you would see he just wants <insert false statement about shared values here>. This is why you lost the election.”

That about cover the conservative response to every issue?
 
CFordUNC said:
Thank the good Lord that today’s Republicans were not around in the 1940’s or else the entire European continent and most of Africa would be speaking Deutsch, and the entire Pacific rim- and perhaps even some of the US West Coast – would be speaking Japanese.
Click to expand...
Or 1770s America.

Hey colonists, try looking at this from King George's point of view. It costs money to protect the colonies. It is only reasonable that the colonists bear that expense. And you cannot seriously expect representation in Parliament. It is far too long of a voyage to have meaningful representation. And really, if you hadn't been flirting with France, we would not have needed to crack down on you. Ultimately, you are just being unreasonable.
 
Ramrouser said:
Biden did nothing to prevent Russia from invading Ukraine other than stating "DON'T" - real effective.
Click to expand...
You left out the part where he warned the world what was coming, preemptively rebutted Russia's propaganda, and put together a global coalition to defend Ukraine. Sanctions on Russia to deplete their fighting ability, frozen assets of oligarchs that might be used to compensate Ukraine when this is over, etc.

It was the single most effective response to sovereign aggression in my lifetime. Even Barack wouldn't have done as well. And that Russia has nukes makes it all the more intrepid, bold and principled.
 
superrific said:
You left out the part where he warned the world what was coming, preemptively rebutted Russia's propaganda, and put together a global coalition to defend Ukraine. Sanctions on Russia to deplete their fighting ability, frozen assets of oligarchs that might be used to compensate Ukraine when this is over, etc.

It was the single most effective response to sovereign aggression in my lifetime. Even Barack wouldn't have done as well. And that Russia has nukes makes it all the more intrepid, bold and principled.
Click to expand...

A-freaking-men, brother. A-freaking-men.

My complaint with Biden prior to his ascension to the Presidency is that he seemed to get all the 50-50 decisions wrong when he was in the Senate. But I was wrong. When it came to the onset of the Ukraine war, he nailed the response. He absolutely stuck the landing, and he doesn't get enough credit for it.
 
Callatoroy said:
I would love to know the details about what went into the decision to bring cameras into the room. My guess is it was trump's but that was a really bad move on his part.
Click to expand...
JFC. Do you think Zelensky invited a full press corp assembly to the Oval Office? It was a bad move on Trump’s part only if he was acting in a good faith, honest broker capacity. Not even you are dumb enough to believe that. Maybe I’m wrong on that point, in which case I’ll ask do you play poker?
 
rodoheel said:
This seems to be operating under the premise that Putin will agree with Ukraine joining the EU and getting security guarantees from Europe and the US as long as they don't join NATO. I don't think Putin would agree to that at all. The whole point for Putin is to be able to control and dominate a weak Ukraine. He can't do that if they're part of the EU and have a security guarantee from the US and Europe. That basically creates, in the aggregate, the reasons why Putin doesn't want Ukraine in NATO; he doesn't want them under either the economic influence of the West or protected militarily by the West,
Click to expand...

Fair point. If we were engaged in a proper pre-negotiation phase - and we clearly aren't - I would argue that we have leverage to press for EU optionality based on:

- the economic impacts of the war on Russia might be existential to the regime over the next 24 months.
- getting the Donbass allows him to declare victory internally.
- international recognition of the Crimean annexation is important to him.

In the current Trumpy environment, the concessions we've made prior to entering negotiations means that none of this matters.
 
superrific said:
You left out the part where he warned the world what was coming, preemptively rebutted Russia's propaganda, and put together a global coalition to defend Ukraine. Sanctions on Russia to deplete their fighting ability, frozen assets of oligarchs that might be used to compensate Ukraine when this is over, etc.

It was the single most effective response to sovereign aggression in my lifetime. Even Barack wouldn't have done as well. And that Russia has nukes makes it all the more intrepid, bold and principled.
Click to expand...
I’ve given Biden credit for his response to the invasion in the weeks following Russia’s commencement of hostilities. No one wanted Russia to take over Ukraine and put Western Europe in danger. But it’s fairly easy to build a European coalition when Russia starts a land war in Eastern Europe ( first in 80 years) and nothing stands in the way of Russia invading their country except the Ukrainian army. Pretty easy to motivate Western Europe to act in their own self defense. For this reason I would rank higher GHW Bush’s coalition in the first Gulf War.
 
Ramrouser said:
I’ve given Biden credit for his response to the invasion in the weeks following Russia’s commencement of hostilities. No one wanted Russia to take over Ukraine and put Western Europe in danger. But it’s fairly easy to build a European coalition when Russia starts a land war in Eastern Europe ( first in 80 years) and nothing stands in the way of Russia invading their country except the Ukrainian army. Pretty easy to motivate Western Europe to act in their own self defense. For this reason I would rank higher GHW Bush’s coalition in the first Gulf War.
Click to expand...
Do you think Trump would have built that coalition? I think the answer is obviously no. Between this bullshit and his attempted shakedown of Ukraine in 2019, I doubt he would have tried. But had he tried, he would have failed miserably because Trump is congenitally incapable of building coalitions.

It's much fucking easier to build a coalition to boot Iraq out of Kuwait than to fight against a huge nuclear-armed country. But there's no degree of difficulty score, here. The point is that the main reason that Russia didn't walk all over Ukraine was the Biden administration.
 
Biden's and GWHB's actions were exceptional foreign policy responses. Over the past 35 years, only the efforts of Nunn and Lugar to denuclearize the former SSRs meet that high bar.

Today, um, fell short.
 
Ramrouser said:
I’ve given Biden credit for his response to the invasion in the weeks following Russia’s commencement of hostilities. No one wanted Russia to take over Ukraine and put Western Europe in danger. But it’s fairly easy to build a European coalition when Russia starts a land war in Eastern Europe ( first in 80 years) and nothing stands in the way of Russia invading their country except the Ukrainian army. Pretty easy to motivate Western Europe to act in their own self defense. For this reason I would rank higher GHW Bush’s coalition in the first Gulf War.
Click to expand...
Bush was up against a moderate fighting army with no nuclear weapons ....................
 
Ramrouser said:
I’ve given Biden credit for his response to the invasion in the weeks following Russia’s commencement of hostilities. No one wanted Russia to take over Ukraine and put Western Europe in danger. But it’s fairly easy to build a European coalition when Russia starts a land war in Eastern Europe ( first in 80 years) and nothing stands in the way of Russia invading their country except the Ukrainian army. Pretty easy to motivate Western Europe to act in their own self defense. For this reason I would rank higher GHW Bush’s coalition in the first Gulf War.
Click to expand...
God help your clients.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top