I remember a good friend who taught in a high school in Maine…..a school in a Trumplican part of Maine……she called the mother of a student…….the student was struggling……not because the material was too difficult……the student had mental health issues.
I SO want to make a Momma Flag joke here... but her boy did about as well as can be done so far.
Remember, Maine is home to “pearl clutching” Susan Collins.
Agree. And as for the idiotic zerohedge commentary, I get the concern about the power of district judges when they issue universal injunctions. But the only way Barrett’s comment about the imperial judiciary makes any sense is if you ignore the existence of the court on which she herself sits. That’s the difference between her concerns and Jackson’s. Her opinion is not just enabling an imperial presidency, but is also neutering the ability of the Supreme Court to exercise its own constitutional power in response to executive illegality. It’s an expansion of the power of the president from both ends.
There's a specific subtext to this particular dispute not entirely apparent in the opinions, which I will describe later when I have a chance.
It’s incredible how willing you are to show how you lack any understanding of the legal terms you use here.
Nothing Jackson wrote has anything to do with CLS, as anyone who knows anything about CLS or frankly the law would know. You assume she's doing CLS because she's black. What she wrote, actually, is sort of the opposite of CLS.
