- Messages
- 2,286
Wow. Does Assad have a militarized force willing to fight for him? Even a “kings guard”? The speed with which this has unfolded is shocking.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just like Afghanistan or Libya. Once the foreign support goes away, these regimes can fall very quickly.Wow. Does Assad have a militarized force willing to fight for him? Even a “kings guard”? The speed with which this has unfolded is shocking.
Assad’s reign may be over but the chaos has probably just begun for Syrians.
Despite the rambling weirdness, and the logical disconnect of criticizing Obama for staying out of it, while he advocates the same thing, the last four sentences are why Trump's foreign policy is a popular position. Expect similar choices throughout his presidency.
The problem is that he's a one size fits all guy. I'm with him on this one but wouldn't be with him if he took this view on the Ukraine because that's a positive for us and all we have to do is send lawyers, guns and money. We've done that everywhere in the world for 75 years. This time, we've learned not to send soldiers.Despite the rambling weirdness, and the logical disconnect of criticizing Obama for staying out of it, while he advocates the same thing, the last four sentences are why Trump's foreign policy is a popular position. Expect similar choices throughout his presidency.
I think it's still a bit of a wait and see. Despite what we hear on here, I don't think Trump is willing to bend over for Putin. I think Trump would very much like to end the Ukraine war but not be criticized for being a loser. So that likely plays out as an opening and closing of the weapon spigot based on Russia and Ukraine's willingness to make concessions towards peace. That likely means Ukraine loses territory and becomes some sort of non-NATO buffer state that leans to the West. It also likely means zielinski will keep his job unless he's voted out at some point. That's my guess as to how it will play out but we'll see.The problem is that he's a one size fits all guy. I'm with him on this one but wouldn't be with him if he took this view on the Ukraine because that's a positive for us and all we have to do is send lawyers, guns and money. We've done that everywhere in the world for 75 years. This time, we've learned not to send soldiers.
He's been bending over for Putin for a decade but you think that stops now?I think it's still a bit of a wait and see. Despite what we hear on here, I don't think Trump is willing to bend over for Putin. I think Trump would very much like to end the Ukraine war but not be criticized for being a loser. So that likely plays out as an opening and closing of the weapon spigot based on Russia and Ukraine's willingness to make concessions towards peace. That likely means Ukraine loses territory and becomes some sort of non-NATO buffer state that leans to the West. It also likely means zielinski will keep his job unless he's voted out at some point. That's my guess as to how it will play out but we'll see.
As for the Palestinians, there's not going to be too much even-handedness there. It's going to be the bombings will continue until capitulation.
I haven’t been right about much recently so I’ll take this one.I'd put big money on Russia, followed by Iran.
Assad doesn't seem like the kind of guy who would try to tough it in the mountains. Pretty much a palace dude his whole life.I was wrong on this one. I thought he'd stay in the mountains, but guess he'll be Snowden's neighbor.