- Messages
- 5,242
Especially when one doesn't have a clue about negotiations.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Especially when one doesn't have a clue about negotiations.
That's the plan, right? To get manufacturing to move. But as usual, trump failed and they are moving the wrong way.Automakers Race to Find Workaround to China’s Stranglehold on Rare-Earth Magnets
Major manufacturers, fearful they will have to shut down assembly lines, consider moving some parts production to China
—> https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/...2?st=3aEzXr&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
“…
Several traditional and electric-vehicle makers—and their suppliers—are considering shifting some auto-parts manufacturing to China to avoid looming factory shutdowns, people familiar with the situation said.
Ideas under review include producing electric motors in Chinese factories or shipping made-in-America motors to China to have magnets installed. Moving production to China as a way to get around the export controls on rare-earth magnets could work because the restrictions only cover magnets, not finished parts, the people said.
If automakers end up shifting some production to China, it would amount to a remarkable outcome from a trade war initiated by President Trump with the intention of bringing manufacturing back to the U.S. …”
——
![]()
Honestly, I think Trump was intending this post as a compliment to Xi (and an excuse for status of the negotiations).Especially when one doesn't have a clue about negotiations.
I'm not sure. If it were to be a complement wouldn't he have included a golden key?Honestly, I think Trump was intending this post as a compliment to Xi (and an excuse for status of the negotiations).
Lutnick, like Trump, is basing his position on trade deficits. The elimination of all tariffs with all countries wouldn’t fix our trade deficits (which this administration views as a problem….I think it’s irrelevant.) But a good agreement to these fools is one which would greatly reduce or eliminate trade deficits which is complete fantasy and a ridiculous basis for trade policy.Well then...
What does he see as a good agreement?
Too bad it's not true.
“… Until now, Xi had resisted getting on the phone with Trump as the Chinese leader wanted the White House to first dial down its pressure on Beijing, according to people close to China’s decision-making.
However, faced with mounting economic pressure, Xi also has to prevent the Chinese economy from falling into an abyss. Managing relations with Washington is key to that.
In an initial sign that Beijing was engaged with Washington in arranging the call, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi met with David Perdue, the U.S. ambassador to Beijing, on Tuesday. Wang urged the U.S. to “create the necessary conditions” for bilateral relations to get back on the right track.
Then on Thursday, Chinese Vice President Han Zheng also met a U.S. delegation for a “Track II” dialogue, or discussions among nongovernmental groups on both sides, saying that bilateral relations are now at “a crucial juncture.”…”