The Charlie Kirk Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rock
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 4K
  • Views: 94K
  • Politics 
1. You are comparing the murder of a black man by a police officer while other police officers stood around and watched to the murder of a man by a regular civilian. Even dumb MAGAs understand the difference because when you ask them why they need AR15s the common response is to be able to fight against an oppressive government.

2. You are comparing a picture of a memorial to a riot. Compare the memorial to pictures of Floyd’s funeral and they will look remarkably similar. Why didn’t you compare Floyd’s funeral to Fox News people screeching about going to war with the democrats after Kirk’s murder? Because it would tell the exact opposite of what your dumb meme did?

3. Floyd’s murderer was not yet arrested.

4. There was never any doubt that Kirk’s murderer would be brought to justice.

5. There is a history of black people being brutalized by police.

6. Who the fuck would Kirk supporters be rioting against? It would make no sense.

Is that enough, or do you need more?

As to your larger point, if you want to compare violent reactions of right versus left, try comparing apples to apples.
For example, how each side reacted to losing the presidential election in 20 and 24?
Or compare how many politically motivated murders each side commits?
I imagine it is because when you compare apples to apples, the republicans come out looking bad.
 
From which direction were you coming...north or south?

I wanna go find that billboard.
North. Driving from Charlotte (so driving from 85).

ETA: It was a digital billboard that switched between that and what appeared to be a local news promo. Not sure if it switched to anything else in addition to those two things.
 
Last edited:
North. Driving from Charlotte (so driving from 85).

ETA: It was a digital billboard that switched between that and what appeared to be a local news promo. Not sure if it switched to anything else in addition to those two things.
Thanks. I wonder why I need to visit Gastonia? (Yeah, there’s no need to visit Gastonia.)
 
We went to the beach this weekend and as we were driving back through Wilmington there was a big billboard there for Charlie Kirk sponsored by the New Hanover Republican Party
 
1. You are comparing the murder of a black man by a police officer while other police officers stood around and watched to the murder of a man by a regular civilian. Even dumb MAGAs understand the difference because when you ask them why they need AR15s the common response is to be able to fight against an oppressive government.

2. You are comparing a picture of a memorial to a riot. Compare the memorial to pictures of Floyd’s funeral and they will look remarkably similar. Why didn’t you compare Floyd’s funeral to Fox News people screeching about going to war with the democrats after Kirk’s murder? Because it would tell the exact opposite of what your dumb meme did?

3. Floyd’s murderer was not yet arrested.

4. There was never any doubt that Kirk’s murderer would be brought to justice.

5. There is a history of black people being brutalized by police.

6. Who the fuck would Kirk supporters be rioting against? It would make no sense.

Is that enough, or do you need more?

As to your larger point, if you want to compare violent reactions of right versus left, try comparing apples to apples.
For example, how each side reacted to losing the presidential election in 20 and 24?
Or compare how many politically motivated murders each side commits?
I imagine it is because when you compare apples to apples, the republicans come out looking bad.
You reference murder over and over. There was no murder because there was no intent to kill.

You are very biased.
 
You reference murder over and over. There was no murder because there was no intent to kill.

You are very biased.
First, not all murder requires intent to kill. One can be convicted of certain types of murder (including first degree murder under the felony murder rule) without there having been an intent to kill.

Second, Derek Chauvin was convicted of murder (second and third degree).
 
Jury's are far from perfect.

I look at facts also.

Either way, no need to derail this thread, so....
Im just trying to catch up here but did you really dress down a poster for using the word "murder" when that is the actual conviction obtained in the case? Furthermore, did you then justify your chastising post by ignoring the jury verdict and saying you look at facts too? And this was all done because you felt someone else was biased?
 
You reference murder over and over. There was no murder because there was no intent to kill.

You are very biased.
Are you really that fucking stupid. FLOYD WAS MURDERED. God pull your head out of your ass and stop riding the fence on everything.

Here, from Wikipedia: Derek Michael Chauvin (/ˈʃoʊvən/ SHOH-vən; born 1976) is an American former police officer who murdered George Floyd, a 46-year-old African American man, in Minneapolis, Minnesota
 
Back
Top