The Charlie Kirk Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rock
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 5K
  • Views: 121K
  • Politics 

A lot of MAGAs are attacking the guy who sent this tweet and are calling him a leftist misogynist and posting that Erika doesn't need to stay indoors in mourning for a year and how she's just out there earning a living for her kids and so on. They may have a point, but it would be a lot easier to take their criticisms seriously if her late husband hadn't very clearly said that women should be stay-at-home tradwives raising their kids and not pursuing careers outside the home. And he said repeatedly that women should willingly be subordinate to the men in their lives - not just their hubbies, but all men. I'm sure that some will argue that she's just out there bravely carrying on her husband's legacy, but it still goes against what he preached, plain and simple.
 
A lot of MAGAs are attacking the guy who sent this tweet and are calling him a leftist misogynist and posting that Erika doesn't need to stay indoors in mourning for a year and how she's just out there earning a living for her kids and so on. They may have a point, but it would be a lot easier to take their criticisms seriously if her late husband hadn't very clearly said that women should be stay-at-home tradwives raising their kids and not pursuing careers outside the home. And he said repeatedly that women should willingly be subordinate to the men in their lives - not just their hubbies, but all men. I'm sure that some will argue that she's just out there bravely carrying on her husband's legacy, but it still goes against what he preached, plain and simple.
Sure, it is what they both preached, but neither actually believed it. So, it’s okay.
For them.
 
A lot of MAGAs are attacking the guy who sent this tweet and are calling him a leftist misogynist and posting that Erika doesn't need to stay indoors in mourning for a year and how she's just out there earning a living for her kids and so on. They may have a point, but it would be a lot easier to take their criticisms seriously if her late husband hadn't very clearly said that women should be stay-at-home tradwives raising their kids and not pursuing careers outside the home. And he said repeatedly that women should willingly be subordinate to the men in their lives - not just their hubbies, but all men. I'm sure that some will argue that she's just out there bravely carrying on her husband's legacy, but it still goes against what he preached, plain and simple.
Somewhere in Hell, Charlie Kirk is wondering why his wife isn’t at home in the kitchen making dinner for their kids.
 
The MAGA crowd sure is getting a lot of mileage out of her. As much as I have to sympathize with someone with children who lost her spouse to gun violence, the level of hypocrisy is difficult to take. Especially all the rhetoric about "violence only comes from the left". smh
 
Indeed. MAGA is working towards a "classless" society, except in their case they mean a low-class, crass, crude, vulgar white trash one. Or, no class. Just look at what Dear Leader has done to the White House. A gold-covered nightmare. It's like a Bizarro version of the Kennedy White House.
If only what you see outside wasn't better than what you get inside them.
 
It would not surprise me at all if she helped to orchestrate his killing.
That is certainly a provocative view point. I wouldn't go nearly that far, but it is clear that she loves the attention. As others have pointed out, given her husband's promotion of submissive women, it certainly goes against what he preached and it is obvious she couldn't care less.
 
I think the man said that he wouldn't be surprised. Nor would I. That doesn't mean I think she did. I don't. But I wouldn't be surprised.

By contrast, if someone were to assassinate Michelle Obama, and it turned out Barack was involved, then I would be exceedingly surprised.
 
Back
Top