Trump Admin takes over D.C. Policing

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 48K
  • Politics 
We’ll see if it actually happens but it would be a lot easier to send the National Guard to New Orleans with the support of Louisiana politicians … they need some pretext to nationalize the guard if they want to go to Chicago, for instance.
 

Julia Letlow represents Louisiana’s 5th Congressional District. Her District is home to the three most violent cities in the state (Marksville #1, Monroe #2, and Alexandria #3); it also includes three more in the Top 10 (Bogalusa, West Monroe, and Baton Rouge).

New Orleans ranks fifth.
 
This is good, right? Trump isn't overstepping his authority and "invading" Chicago, declaring war on America or whatever else was claimed to be happening.
It is showing some restraint (that does not match his more divisive rhetoric) so far. So, I would call that not as bad as threatened so far, but not good.
 
I predicted weeks ago that Trump was "all talk" about sending the Guard into Chicago and wouldn't actually do it without the State's request. He was just making the point about Chicago crime and making Dems take the side of crime and lawlessness.
 
I predicted weeks ago that Trump was "all talk" about sending the Guard into Chicago and wouldn't actually do it without the State's request. He was just making the point about Chicago crime and making Dems take the side of crime and lawlessness.
No one with a working brain thinks that is the side Democrats are taking. Of course, you don’t have one
 
I predicted weeks ago that Trump was "all talk" about sending the Guard into Chicago and wouldn't actually do it without the State's request. He was just making the point about Chicago crime and making Dems take the side of crime and lawlessness.
Question - when republicans were freaking the fuck out over Jade Helm, were they on the side of lawlessness?
 
This is good, right? Trump isn't overstepping his authority and "invading" Chicago, declaring war on America or whatever else was claimed to be happening.
What terminology would you use when Trump illegally sends the National Guard into a state without the governor’s consent (as a court ruled he did in Los Angeles)?

Is “illegally sending troops” appreciably different from invading? I also looked up the definition of “invade” and it fits very well into what Trump was threatening to do.

As for “declaring war,” it was Trump that first use the word “war.”
 
What terminology would you use when Trump illegally sends the National Guard into a state without the governor’s consent (as a court ruled he did in Los Angeles)?
I think the President has the authority to send the Marines into LA to protect Federal buildings, which is all they were doing. They weren't engaging with rioters.
Is “illegally sending troops” appreciably different from invading? I also looked up the definition of “invade” and it fits very well into what Trump was threatening to do.

As for “declaring war,” it was Trump that first use the word “war.”
I haven't seen an true example of "illegally" sending troops anywhere so far, that includes LA and DC, which is under the control of the federal government.

 
Last edited:
I think the President has the authority to send the Marines into LA to protect Federal buildings, which is all they were doing. They weren't engaging with rioters.

I haven't seen a true example of "illegally" sending troops anywhere so far, that includes LA and DC, which is under the control of the federal government.
A court ruled it was illegal.

But forget LA for the moment. If Trump did send in the National Guard to Chicago without the governor’s consent, do you agree that would be illegal? If so, what word would you use?
 
Back
Top