Trump, Gabbard press Obama “treason” claims

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 413
  • Views: 8K
  • Politics 
Zen over here perpetuating yet another bit of fascist propaganda … from Putin … via the Washington Times.

Also, the timeline lies are intention, not idiocy. It’s a combination of mimicking the addled godhead and further normalization of misinformation. Flooding the zone with impossibilities wears opposition down, and when you have a cult, there’s already a built in 35-40% that will believe ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING.
This shit has been patiently explained multiple times on this thread yet he rehashes nonsense over and over. It’s almost as if he has an agenda…..
 
No shit. With all the old hits they are dusting off and recycling this is strange behavior. It is surprising that they are throwing so much against the wall at once and leaving no dry powder. They must be more concerned than I would expect so there must be some serious shit they fear can potentially be exposed. Their willingness to go immediately to defcon 1 tells me some very raw nerves have been touched.
I’m betting we are not seeing those files to any real extent during the life of this administration. Somewhere in those files the scythe of the grim reaper is reaching for someone important. Maybe Trump, maybe big supporter(s)… . Someone considered invaluable.
 
Probably for the same reason the Biden admin didn't, say. try to fire every Republican in the government or have political stooges metaphorically suck off Biden at cabinet meetings - because the Biden admin wasn't run by a banana republic-style strongman seeking to govern via coercion rather than through the use of the actual levers of government.
The fear of Trump sent the Democratic party into a proverbial tailspin. It's hard to believe that something that damning, not confidential and not limited by a court case wouldn't have been released.
 
What does seem to be true is that Russia held back the information that they believed they could leverage IF Hillary won, while releasing everything else they hoped would help Trump/hurt Hillary.
Assuming that is true (and it appears to be the case subject to uncertainty about what they hacked but held back versus what they manufactured and leaked via other means), does this make anyone wonder what the Russians held back to leverage over Trump?
 
The fear of Trump sent the Democratic party into a proverbial tailspin. It's hard to believe that something that damning, not confidential and not limited by a court case wouldn't have been released.
Well they didn't prosecute him day 1 of Biden's tenure either. They moved too slow , in my opinion, but whether Dems have not shown a willingness to stretch laws/break norms in the way Trump/MAGA has.

Its not surprising that they didn't release any Trump specific info (I think they should have) and still don't respond in kind to Trump.
 
Assuming that is true (and it appears to be the case subject to uncertainty about what they hacked but held back versus what they manufactured and leaked via other means), does this make anyone wonder what the Russians held back to leverage over Trump?
Russia may have held back info on Trump, if it existed. It seems that they were more concerned, not surprisingly, about a Hillary win. I think most people were expecting a Hillary win.
 
I don’t know why, but shit like this always makes me think back to the infamous Zelenskyy/trump meeting at the WH. When it went off the rails Vance said something to the effect that Zelenskyy was trying this issue in the media. It was obvious then what Vance was doing because that’s been trump’s strategy for the entirety of his political career. They try their enemies in the public sphere with dubious claims because the vast majority of Americans have very little legal knowledge (me).

They’ve thrown a bunch of bullshit out there again that the media has to sift through and spend time and resources explaining and refuting. There never seems to be a long lasting political price paid for this obvious so they continue to do it over and over again.

I agree with the poster(s) mentioning just how much is being thrown out all at once right now. There has to be something really bad for trump and/or his buddies.

I’m going to mention this again. Magats are edgelords. They don’t need Obama, Hillary, Biden, et. al. locked up. It’s the anticipation that get’s them off. That and they’re just used to most everything in their sad little lives being disappointments.
 
Last edited:
Well they didn't prosecute him day 1 of Biden's tenure either. They moved too slow , in my opinion, but whether Dems have not shown a willingness to stretch laws/break norms in the way Trump/MAGA has.

Its not surprising that they didn't release any Trump specific info (I think they should have) and still don't respond in kind to Trump.
Is releasing Intel on Russian election interference really stretching the law? They'd basically be doing what DNI is doing now and nobody seems overly concerned about the legality of it. It's viewed as necessary transparency...which we need more of.
 
Is releasing Intel on Russian election interference really stretching the law? They'd basically be doing what DNI is doing now and nobody seems overly concerned about the legality of it. It's viewed as necessary transparency...which we need more of.
No, because Russia did try to interfere and Team Trump was in communication with them and open to the help...even if not well coordinated.
 
The nail that stands up gets hammered down and I guarantee the right wing media would have rode it until the old nag died. In this administration, it wouldn't draw attention after the wrecking ball hit. The ass kissers in the captive media are too busy begging scraps and cowering in the corner to challenge Trump.

Btw, that's one big example of how the office of President is really misused.
 
It turns out Merrick Garland didn’t weaponize the DOJ the way Trump appointees have.
lol. You mean uncovering the left's dirty laundry, lies, and conspiracy, and exposing it for the world to see equals weaponization? No doubt that trump is going after those who, as it turns out, were lying in large part about him and were in fact weaponizing the doj to keep him from winning a 2nd term. That you aren't even the least bit bothered by what is coming out says a lot about your character. Before you try to play whataboutism, I'm on record on this board stating I recognize and admit trump's an awful person and morally compromised.
 
Let me put it another way: Why would Russia have wanted Trump to win if they had more leverage on Hillary?
"Wanting Trump to win" is just another way of saying 'Wanting Hillary to lose".

I think most people believed Hillary WAS going to win, so Russia was planning accordingly.
 
Not sure what you are referring to regarding Russia hacking intelligence being a DOJ thing...
Farce implied that the Biden admin not releasing dirt on Trump, if any existed, was some how related to the DOJ.

"It turns out Merrick Garland didn’t weaponize the DOJ the way Trump appointees have."
Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary Clinton emails
Russia did not hack voting machines to flip Clinton votes to Trump
Agree.
 
Sure, we'll probably never know if Hillary is as ill as the emails supposedly made here appear.

What does seem to be true is that Russia held back the information that they believed they could leverage IF Hillary won, while releasing everything else they hoped would help Trump/hurt Hillary.
LOL. None of this HRC shit is real. It's all bullshit, all the time. Don't you ever learn? Remember Comer's "whistleblower" who was going to expose the whole Biden family but actually was a felon facing indictment.

If what Putin supposedly had on HRC was remotely true, then HRC would be in terrible shape physically and probably near death if not already dead.
 
Back
Top