Trump, Gabbard press Obama “treason” claims

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 513
  • Views: 10K
  • Politics 
Geisterfahrer said:
Fine. Neither is it a meaningful metric that Europe is “laughing at us”, or “sad for us”. WGAF? What matters is how we feel about ourselves, and apart from hardcore MAGA, everyone feels like shit.
Click to expand...
You are not wrong about everyone feels like shit. On that we are of a mind.
 
SmilingJack said:
It’s as if they don’t know they’ve won the last election? They’re stuck in pre-2020.
Click to expand...
Fascists are the most insecure, cynical, and unreflective people on earth. Their superpower is convincing vulnerable masses that such antisocial behavior is ok - in fact, that it’s natural, because someone somewhere in the world is holding them all down. Someone. Somewhere.

They have to keep up the aggrievement game, because if they don’t, a portion of their flock might have enough emotional energy to see how the high priests are stealing their pension, their infrastructure, their economy, and eventually their lives.

Healing said:
I find stupidity imminently pitiable, and often worthy of sympathy and/or empathy (I've certainly acted stupid as hell, many times).

More often than not, folks clearly working with strained and paltry neural connections didn't come about the state volitionally. It's often painful to observe the results of their circumstances, and really fucking sucks when those results impact the greater "we", but I find my ire is reserved for the machiavellian anti-social behavior that dominates the funders and apparatchiks of the right.

Ricky and Stephanie of rural Chatham, whose milieu was, from birth, and is today aggrieved, rural, white, in a Fox-flooded dying hamlet littered with industrial waste are the folks I find most pitiable. They're the target of the grift EVERY.SINGLE.DAY. and are kept in an unending state of anger/fight/flight.
Click to expand...

Healing said:
These ghouls shit on maga, everyday. These ghouls shit on the military, everyday. These ghouls shit on every single demo that voted for them, except the kleptocrats, oligarchs, and plutocrats.

Some people want to be ruled, and forcibly drag every one of us along with them into hell. I will never be surprised, but will continually feel shock, that people CHOOSE to have their accounts raided, services gutted, communities hollowed, jobs offshored, and have poison rain from the sky and dumped into their water, over accepting the existence of certain kinds of people they will likely never encounter, and if they do the encounter(s) will have zero material effect on them.
Click to expand...
 
Remember Dan Bongino's cryptic message a week or two ago about "discoveries that chilled him to the bone, that have changed his life forever? There were actually non-MAGAts thinking he was affected by hearing the truth from Ghislaine. Ridiculous. He was prepping MAGAts for more Epstein deflection to join Tulsi, AG Blondi and others with silly Obamagate claims. Well just a week ago he or his office created a FB account, probably other sites as well. Feeding crumbs of nonsense to the cult making them deranged about the "greatest scandal in U.S. history." Today he posted a non-detailed "press release" about a whistleblower coming forward and saying superiors at DOJ forced him to keep pushing "collusion claims" even though said individual and all at DOJ had disproven it at the time. Here is my response to his one week old FB account on this phony release:

"Put up or shut up. Bring receipts and charges, testimony under oath. Only gullible uneducated MAGAts believe. Obviously contrived in steps: 1) Dan sends out cryptic msg. about "discoveries." 2) Create a new FB account (others?)a week ago 3) Flunky responds all day on account 4) *Divert from Epstein, DEFLECTION. Finally, your 2018 tell on Fox, "My life's focus now is to own the Libs." I call BS as a Pub. Disgraceful whining traitor. Crying just a month ago about how hard it is working all day again."
 
nycfan said:


IMG_8194.jpeg
Click to expand...

All of thius of source is a distraction from Epstein and Trump's Failing Tariffs, which are crushing the manufacturing sector and the consumer sector. Since the tariffs are indiscriminatory, except sort of countries by whim, they are consumption taxes on consumers and extra cost by importers and their who are just recovering from COVID.
 
IMG_8432.jpeg





“… John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director, said in a statement that the materials proved that suspicions of Russian collusion stemmed from “a coordinated plan to prevent and destroy Donald Trump’s presidency.”

… In reality, the annex shows the opposite, indicating that a key piece of supposed evidence for the claim that Mrs. Clinton approved a plan to tie Mr. Trump to Russia is not credible: Mr. Durham concluded that the email from July 27, 2016, and a related one dated two days earlier were probably manufactured.

Ahead of the 2020 election, Mr. Ratcliffe, as director of national intelligence in Mr. Trump’s first term, had declassified and released the crux of the July 27 email, even though he acknowledged doubts about its credibility. Officials did “not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication,” he said.

Among some Trump supporters, the message became known as the “Clinton Plan intelligence,” as Mr. Durham put it in his final report.

In his report, Mr. Durham used the U.S. government’s knowledge of the supposed plan, via the Russian memos, to criticize F.B.I. officials involved in the Russia investigation for not being more skeptical when they later received a copy of the Steele dossier and used it to obtain a wiretap order. The dossier, a compendium of Trump-Russia claims compiled by a former British spy, stemmed from a Democratic opposition research effort and was later discredited.

“Whether or not the Clinton Plan intelligence was based on reliable or unreliable information, or was ultimately true or false,” Mr. Durham wrote, agents should have been more cautious when approaching material that appeared to have partisan origins.

Mr. Durham’s report also mentioned that Mrs. Clinton and others in the campaign dismissed the allegation as ridiculous, positing that it was Russian disinformation.

But Mr. Durham banished to the annex concrete details he had found that bolstered her campaign’s rebuttal, burying until now the conclusion that the email he called the “Clinton Plan intelligence” was almost certainly a product of Russian disinformation.…”
 
nycfan said:
IMG_8432.jpeg





“… John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director, said in a statement that the materials proved that suspicions of Russian collusion stemmed from “a coordinated plan to prevent and destroy Donald Trump’s presidency.”

… In reality, the annex shows the opposite, indicating that a key piece of supposed evidence for the claim that Mrs. Clinton approved a plan to tie Mr. Trump to Russia is not credible: Mr. Durham concluded that the email from July 27, 2016, and a related one dated two days earlier were probably manufactured.

Ahead of the 2020 election, Mr. Ratcliffe, as director of national intelligence in Mr. Trump’s first term, had declassified and released the crux of the July 27 email, even though he acknowledged doubts about its credibility. Officials did “not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication,” he said.

Among some Trump supporters, the message became known as the “Clinton Plan intelligence,” as Mr. Durham put it in his final report.

In his report, Mr. Durham used the U.S. government’s knowledge of the supposed plan, via the Russian memos, to criticize F.B.I. officials involved in the Russia investigation for not being more skeptical when they later received a copy of the Steele dossier and used it to obtain a wiretap order. The dossier, a compendium of Trump-Russia claims compiled by a former British spy, stemmed from a Democratic opposition research effort and was later discredited.

“Whether or not the Clinton Plan intelligence was based on reliable or unreliable information, or was ultimately true or false,” Mr. Durham wrote, agents should have been more cautious when approaching material that appeared to have partisan origins.

Mr. Durham’s report also mentioned that Mrs. Clinton and others in the campaign dismissed the allegation as ridiculous, positing that it was Russian disinformation.

But Mr. Durham banished to the annex concrete details he had found that bolstered her campaign’s rebuttal, burying until now the conclusion that the email he called the “Clinton Plan intelligence” was almost certainly a product of Russian disinformation.…”
Click to expand...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top