- Messages
- 1,915
That is sad but true no doubtMy parents live off of their social security payments and Medicare covering most of their medical costs. They would still find a way to blame the godless Dems.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is sad but true no doubtMy parents live off of their social security payments and Medicare covering most of their medical costs. They would still find a way to blame the godless Dems.
Probably, however …If they cut social security, it could make the Dobbs outage seem miniscule
Except, as someone else already pointed out, in Loeffler's case "successful" needs some clarification. Loeffler's "success" came after she married a billionaire businessman and then spent her entire "successful career" working in said husband's business empire. I mean, if you want to call that successful then by all means go ahead, but don't pretend that she worked herself up the hard way - she basically managed several of her husband's business subsidiaries. Maybe she would have gotten there on her own, maybe she wouldn't.I think it’s good to have talented, successful businessmen and women in the cabinet.
Given UNC's historic reputation as a liberal university I would imagine that it won't be good. I was wondering which one of Trump's appointees would fire the first shot of what will almost certainly be a major government effort to move (or just force) America's public and private universities in a rightward direction, much as Orban did in Hungary. As a private university it will be harder to go after dook, although withholding NIH grants would certainly hurt even them, although likely not to the extent it would at UNC.So I'm wondering what impact the NIH director will have for dook** and UNC who receive hundreds of millions of dollars in NIH research grants...
![]()
'Cancel culture' colleges could soon see money targeted by Trump's NIH pick: report
President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to lead the National Institute of Health is ready to settle a score – and he’s revving up a fight against campus culture at elite universities, according to a new report.And that could mean Stanford professor and economist Dr. Jay Bhattacharya uses the power...www.rawstory.com
Courts won't let him do that. Not even SCOTUS. It's not the job of the NIH to police university culture. Congress did not give it the authority to make determinations about research funding based on those types of considerations.Given UNC's historic reputation as a liberal university I would imagine that it won't be good. I was wondering which one of Trump's appointees would fire the first shot of what will almost certainly be a major government effort to move (or just force) America's public and private universities in a rightward direction, much as Orban did in Hungary. As a private university it will be harder to go after dook, although withholding NIH grants would certainly hurt even them, although likely not to the extent it would at UNC.
I wish I could believe in your confidence that the courts under the Trump administration will protect us from the control of the billionaire oligarchs and all efforts that Trump and his minions will seek to exercise in the establishment of an autocratic/fascist state.Courts won't let him do that. Not even SCOTUS. It's not the job of the NIH to police university culture. Congress did not give it the authority to make determinations about research funding based on those types of considerations.
You're just now wondering that?So he wants to keep the Dreamers but deport US citizens? I’m really wondering how much he understands what he’s talking about.
Lebensraum and we will need their water.We are invading Canada for lebensraum aren’t we?
I was being more than a little sarcastic. But the total absence of logic in Trump’s positions really does still surprise me sometimes.You're just now wondering that?
I was being more than a little sarcastic. But the total absence of logic in Trump’s positions really does still surprise me sometimes.
Got it. Agree with all. Sorry I missed the sarcasm.I was being more than a little sarcastic. But the total absence of logic in Trump’s positions really does still surprise me sometimes.
ETA — Also, I think this speaks to the way labels impact Trump. Dreamers = good. Anchor babies = bad. If you flipped the terms, he would flip his policies.
Deport them to where? What’s the difference in them vs Dreamers? Only their citizenship, which is a birthright. He can attempt to change that but I don’t believe even this fucked up Supreme Court will allow him to make it retroactive!So he wants to keep the Dreamers but deport US citizens? I’m really wondering how much he understands what he’s talking about.