Trump / Musk (other than DOGE) Omnibus Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 12K
  • Views: 323K
  • Politics 
I've been wondering something...since Musk is now saying that Twitter has replaced mainstream media...should it be treated as media by the law? I believe Zuck has fought against tooth and nail when it comes to Facebook, and so far the government regulators have agreed.
 
For the sake of society, computer programs that emulate humans (bots) should be made illegal, and corporations should be liable for their algorithms.
 
Just no grasp of economic history. Back at that time the US was trying to catch up with other world powers. If you are the world's largest economy, you want unbridled access to foreign markets. As soon as you slap tariffs, other countries will respond in kind.
Also, the pre-16th Amendment federal government was much, much, much smaller.

We didn't have much of a standing military, and we invested like nothing in weapons system. There was no social security, or Medicare, or Medicaid. There was no FCC because there was no C to speak of. There was no FTC either. Or EPA. There were no federal roads to maintain.
 
Let The Year of Magical Thinking commence in earnest.
Hmm. At least he mentioned no tax on tips. That's one of the most moronic policies ever and I assume that it will not go anywhere in the end, but at least he remembered the little guys for a minute or two.

I'm curious to see how much the GOP embraces this Magical Thinking. Unlike Trump, they all have to run for office again, and it will be hazardous for them if they cause massive inflation (from out of control government debt in addition to the other shit). Blind partisan allegiance and belief in conspiracy only goes so far.
 
Just an unbelievably reckless decision by the Pubs that puts our entire military at extreme risk.
I remain skeptical that he will get confirmed. But liberals need to realize something: nobody who matters here cares whether he raped anyone. That ship has sailed. It sailed after Kav but it has especially sailed now.

So if they are in the committee hearings asking him about his personal failings, they will be doing it wrong.

The primary and most important reason not to confirm him is that he is so comically underqualified for the position that it's almost hard to wrap one's head around. And thus the only reason why anyone would ever choose him is if they cannot find another military person to promise the fealty Trump expects. He's obviously not going to run the department. But he will give orders.
 


“… Trump's decision in 2018 to withdraw from an Obama-era nuclear dealprompted Tehran to accelerate its nuclear program, such that it's now a de facto "nuclear threshold state." Officials and diplomats from the U.S., EU and Israel all told Axios they expect Trump to face an Iran crisis in 2025.

State of play: Trump and his advisers are planning to quickly return to the "maximum pressure" campaign they conducted against Iran between 2018 and 2020.

Behind the scenes: Several Trump advisers privately concede Iran's program is now so far along that the strategy might not be effective. That makes a military option a real possibility. …”
 


“… Trump's decision in 2018 to withdraw from an Obama-era nuclear dealprompted Tehran to accelerate its nuclear program, such that it's now a de facto "nuclear threshold state." Officials and diplomats from the U.S., EU and Israel all told Axios they expect Trump to face an Iran crisis in 2025.

State of play: Trump and his advisers are planning to quickly return to the "maximum pressure" campaign they conducted against Iran between 2018 and 2020.

Behind the scenes: Several Trump advisers privately concede Iran's program is now so far along that the strategy might not be effective. That makes a military option a real possibility. …”

TDS won’t allow MAGA to admit Trump majorly fucked up.
 
Last edited:
I think one of the most shocking things over the next four years, even to most of MAGA, will be how quickly the geopolitical world deteriorates under Trump's (lack of) stewardship. Quite a few regions have become much more complicated over the last four years. Trumpers like to attribute that to Biden. I have a very strong feeling Biden will be remembered for keeping the trains relatively on the tracks in the face of enormous challenges. We're about to see what happens when you turn the trains over to a bunch of toddlers. It's going to be ugly.

train discover GIF
 

Trump aides ready ‘universal’ tariff plans — with one key change​

President-elect’s aides look at universal import duties, but only on certain sectors, among first big moves of presidency.

"... If implemented, the emerging plans would pare back the most sweeping elements of Trump’s campaign plans but still would be likely to upend global trade and carry major consequences for the U.S. economy and consumers.

As a candidate, Trump called for “universal” tariffs of as high as 10 or 20 percent on everything imported into the United States. Many economists warned that such plans could cause price shocks, and many Republicans in Congress might have criticized them.

Two weeks before Trump takes office, his aides are still discussing plans to impose import duties on goods from every country, the people said. But rather than apply tariffs to all imports, the current discussions center on imposing them only on certain sectors deemed critical to national or economic security — a shift that would jettison a key aspect of Trump’s campaign pledge, at least for now, said the people, who cautioned that no decisions have been finalized and that planning remains in flux. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations.

...The potential change reflects a recognition that Trump’s initial plans — which would have been immediately noticeable in the price of food imports and cheap consumer electronics — could prove politically unpopular and disruptive.

But consideration of universal tariffs of some kind still reflects the Trump team’s determination to implement measures that can’t be easily circumvented by having products shipped via a third country.

Exactly which imports or industries would face tariffs was not immediately clear. Preliminary discussions have largely focused on several key sectors that the Trump team wants to bring back to the United States, the people said. Those include the defense industrial supply chain (through tariffs on steel, iron, aluminum and copper); critical medical supplies (syringes, needles, vials and pharmaceutical materials); and energy production (batteries, rare earth minerals and even solar panels), two of the people said.

It’s also unclear how these plans intersect with Trump’s stated intent to impose 25 percent tariffs on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10 percent tariff on China unless they take measures to reduce migration and drug trafficking. Many business leaders view those measures as unlikely to ever take effect, but some people familiar with the matter said they could be imposed along with universal tariffs on key sectors. ..."

----

Farm/food sector seems noticeably absent from this universal tariff plan ...
 
I've been wondering something...since Musk is now saying that Twitter has replaced mainstream media...should it be treated as media by the law? I believe Zuck has fought against tooth and nail when it comes to Facebook, and so far the government regulators have agreed.
I think Zuck and really all social media platforms don't want to be held liable for what their users post. If you are a newspaper or TV station you have an awful lot of control over what your journalists say or write. You can be held liable because the control is ultimately yours as the owner and publisher. If you are Facebook or Twitter, you can ultimately pull a post or ban a user but its a lot of work and hurts their business model of trying to get new users to sign up and engage. Its also not impossible as you see sites like Craigslist nuke a popular dating section of their site that was also used for prostitution. All sites outside of the dark web police for other illegal activities.

I think there is a reasonable argument to be made that it is possible but maybe not fair to the social media companies or their users.
 
Oh I get why Zuck and other social media founders fought that tooth and nail.

I'm just wondering if Musk preaching from the mountaintop that X (Twitter) is the new media will change the policy position. Not sure you can have it both ways. Feels like the Euros will be the first ones to take their shot on this issue.
 
Back
Top