Trump / Musk (other than DOGE) Omnibus Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 12K
  • Views: 324K
  • Politics 
William McKInley was not president in the 1880s, nor most of the 1890s.

there was a depression from 1882 to 1885 and a recession from 1887 through 1888, then another in 1890.

Two panic and bank runs (1893 and 1896) and another recession in 1899 when McKinkley actually was president

but I know facts mean nothing so tariff away orange man
I wish one of these other leaders would just turn to him and say he is such a dumbass.
 
So if we let a small family from Guatemala stay with us in our house, essentially letting them “hide out” here… would we be shot and killed like the French farmer in the beginning of the 2009 movie “Inglorious Basterds”?
 
So if we let a small family from Guatemala stay with us in our house, essentially letting them “hide out” here… would we be shot and killed like the French farmer in the beginning of the 2009 movie “Inglorious Basterds”?
Don’t rule it out.
 
Sure, there are R voters would take away the right for LGBTQ to marry. Those are people who are "confused" on what it means to have rights that can't be infringed upon by the government. There are legit racists, homophobes, transphobes, etc, but I don't think for a second there are 74 million or even half that and the broad-brush painting of all Trump voters (different than supporters) as being deplorables or garbage or a just a bunch of uninformed racists, xxxphobes, etc is why the Dem party is losing, IMO.
And yet the broad brush painting of all Dem voters as woke libtard communists doesn't seem to hurt Pubs. In fact, I think it is demonstrably true that it helps them.
 
And wholly unsurprising. If Republicans believed differently they would elect different leaders.
Maybe, but Trump hasn't taken an "evangelical" position on abortion, gay marriage or really anything that is important to Christians, has he?
 
The judges he appointed sure have.
It is? You can say that they opened the door to states fully banning it, but they also opened the door to states being even more liberal in allowing it, haven't they?
 
Last edited:
Trump’s sense of humor seems out of whack (even more than usual) on the Canada as a state thing.


That's insulting to call PM Trudeau Governor of a state. Our nation will be led by a clueless boor in 2025.
We will be Ugly Americans to the rest of the world. Except those nations where Trump has economic ties. God help us all.
 
It is? You can say that they opened the door to states fully banning it, but they also opened the door to states being even more liberal in allowing it, haven't they?
We will see why he proposes a national ban. Maybe he can call it a heartbeat law, even thought the heart hasn't yet formed.
 
If you're worried about getting deported probably best not to publish your immigration status in a free article in the New York Times.
 
So if we let a small family from Guatemala stay with us in our house, essentially letting them “hide out” here… would we be shot and killed like the French farmer in the beginning of the 2009 movie “Inglorious Basterds”?
If you ask ZZLers, I suspect most would say yes.

It will never happen, but that's irrelevant.
 
That would be a much different story, though it would have no chance of getting through Congress.
Why would it have no chance? He has the house and the senate, correct?

Noticing the wording changes and talking points over these last two years, they will try it.
 
Back
Top