Trump / Musk (other than DOGE)

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 12K
  • Views: 633K
  • Politics 
EyeballKid said:
That’s what freedom’s all about. You’re free to eat healthy or not—there are plenty of options, particularly for those with the money to pay for organic foods. And you’re free to exercise as much or as little as you’d like.

If you’re suggesting we need governmental intervention to promote healthy eating options and exercise, or that we need to somehow limit people’s freedom of choice—well, that seems a bit hypocritical coming from someone on the right, doesn’t it?
Click to expand...
Agree about the pubs hypocrisy.

But, organic is little more than marketing now.
 
UNCatTech said:
The numbers are very low. I believe I read that the state of NC had 15 trans women athletes.

But thats not really the point. The right wants to use this to turn people against all trans people even those who couldn't care less about playing sports.
Click to expand...
To add and clarify...

The NC High School Athletic Association had 15 total trans athletes in 2023, only 2 of them were trans females. This in a state with roughly 180,000 high school students. This issue is so far down the list of critical matters to address that you can barely see it with the Hubble Telescope. Pub politicians have made this a priority because it's low hanging fruit that they know speaks to their base's bigotries.
 
HeelYeah2012 said:
No, I don’t think it’s hypocritical to think that it’s a worthy goal of government help keep harmful ingredients out of our food.
Click to expand...
It's hypocritical to preach about small government, reducing regulations, staying out of peoples lives, and reducing government cost then turing around and proposing something that requires increased regulation, taking people's choice, increasing government scope and increasing spending.

Something the pubs love to do.
 
UNCatTech said:
It's hypocritical to preach about small government, reducing regulations, staying out of peoples lives, and reducing government cost then turing around and proposing something that requires increased regulation, taking people's choice, increasing government scope and increasing spending.

Something the pubs love to do.
Click to expand...
Disagree. Just because you think government’s role should be limited doesn’t mean you have to think government’s role should be zero.
 
The military thing mostly started with Vietnam, or more correctly lies stemming from Vietnam. The myth of soldiers returning from Vietnam being spat on and being called baby killers is endemic in rightwing propaganda and many people think that it is established fact and even common.

Fwiw, my experience is that most of the Viet vets I knew were more on the side of the demonstrators. I had a buddy throw his Bronze Star in a pile at an anti-war demonstration after he was back home and at UNC.

I'm linking wiki because it gives the broader overview. Feel free to link anything reasonably bias free pro or con concerning this.

en.wikipedia.org

Myth of the spat-on Vietnam veteran - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
 
It's a bad look when you don't announce Opposites Day. This couldn't be more directly contradictory.

Do you have a port were you can just download what you're supposed to think or do you have to log in and learn it? I don't care except as a point of curiosity. I can't help but wonder why these messages are do blatantly cynical and was trying to guess if was input or interpretation.
 
HeelYeah2012 said:
Disagree. Just because you think government’s role should be limited doesn’t mean you have to think government’s role should be zero.
Click to expand...
I didn't say anything about zero.

This is a considerable difference between limited government and controlling American's diets.

But we are used to this. Same limited government people are the ones whinning about the government not helping in so many other areas of life.

The right is only limited government when it fits their worldview. They have no issue with big government programs if it fits their worldview.
 
Something I was thinking about last night had me thinking of another future cost. What happens when the political cycle turns (assuming it does)? How much will reparations cost us. In 88, it was $20,000 a survivor for the Japanese. I suspect that would be cheap these days, even adjusted for inflation. We're looking at 12 million people that we might end up deporting. Btw, that 12 million seems to represent a consensus of centrist reports. Anybody got a more proven number?
 
HeelYeah2012 said:
You’re right that inflation was huge but we had people on this very board acting like inflation and prices were no longer an issue because the year over year inflation rate had normalized - ignoring the fact that prices had gone up 25% cumulatively in a 3 year span or whatever it was.

It was always going to be inflation and immigration if the republicans won. And it was always going to be abortion if the democrats won.

But when you lose a tight election, as someone on the other side who is open to splitting my tickets, it makes me hope the Democrats will at least give some consideration to no longer dying on certain hills that are so absurd, like men playing in women’s sports, illegal immigrants being good because they perform our tough labor, etc.
Click to expand...
And why does it make you hope such things? You've made it patently clear that you will not vote for a Democrat for national office. Hell, half the things you say you want now are either current or past Dem policies that you refused to vote for.
 
The one thing I’ve seen Kennedy propose that I would be all for is ending pharmaceutical ads on tv and radio. It is probably too late since so many people get their news and infotainment online anyway, but I always thought it was a mistake when the Clinton Administration permitted pharma ads back in the 1990s.

OTOH, that would almost immediately starve cable tv of a key source of ad revenue.

But that is not at all worth having Kennedy having any say over US health policy.
 
nycfan said:
The one thing I’ve seen Kennedy propose that I would be all for is ending pharmaceutical ads on tv and radio. It is probably too late since so many people get their news and infotainment online anyway, but I always thought it was a mistake when the Clinton Administration permitted pharma ads back in the 1990s.

OTOH, that would almost immediately starve cable tv of a key source of ad revenue.

But that is not at all worth having Kennedy having any say over US health policy.
Click to expand...
I am all in for end of Pharma ads............and sports gambling ads..............and NC Lottery ads
 
nycfan said:
The one thing I’ve seen Kennedy propose that I would be all for is ending pharmaceutical ads on tv and radio. It is probably too late since so many people get their news and infotainment online anyway, but I always thought it was a mistake when the Clinton Administration permitted pharma ads back in the 1990s.

OTOH, that would almost immediately starve cable tv of a key source of ad revenue.

But that is not at all worth having Kennedy having any say over US health policy.
Click to expand...
But how else will I know what lowers my A1C in a little pill with a big story to tell?
 
superrific said:
They also hate weaponization of government so much that they are appointing a guy to headbb the FBI who has previously invoked the Fifth Amendment before a grand jury.

Also, the guy's 2020 portrait is Manson-esque. I don't know enough about human physiology to assess it. Are there people whose eyes naturally look sociopathic? I don't want to slam on the guy if this is just how he looks, but to me it looks like he's a crazy man.

en.wikipedia.org

Kash Patel - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...
I am scared to give my comment on
CFordUNC said:


Political realignment happening before our eyes!
Click to expand...

I am not sure but I think this realignment may have been ongoing for a few years. My brother who only watches Fox and religious shows, has been talking about this a lot the last couple of years. I don’t know where he got it from but there is a fair amount of overlap between food health and conspiracy theories and Republicans have found a home for conspiracy theorists.
mpaer said:
I am all in for end of Pharma ads............and sports gambling ads..............and NC Lottery ads
Click to expand...
And starving Fox News of revenue
 
Speaking of pharma ads, the stuff I watch on non-streaming TV, which is basically only news and sports, is full of those. Makes me feel old.

Also that can’t be a good sign for college football.
 
When you go very far left (natural health to the extreme) and to the very far right (climate denier, chemtrails, etc) - those paths on the circle eventually meet, which is where we find RFK and Trump. Mistrust of the experts. The overlap of the "do your own research" vein diagram.
 
bassydude77 said:
When you go very far left (natural health to the extreme) and to the very far right (climate denier, chemtrails, etc) - those paths on the circle eventually meet, which is where we find RFK and Trump. Mistrust of the experts. The overlap of the "do your own research" vein diagram.
Click to expand...
I.e. people who convince themselves they're very special little boys and girls.
 
HeelingAg said:
I.e. people who convince themselves they're very special little boys and girls.
Click to expand...
That's humans' reason to be. There is not a philosophy or religion on earth that doesn't exalt man's place on earth and in the universe. Even those who speak of subjugation to a divine power presupposes that any such power has a reason to be interested in them and offer them sustenance, guidance and protection. Considering the age and size of the universe ,I tend to feel such arrogance is a bit undeserved.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top