Trump / Musk (other than DOGE)

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 12K
  • Views: 634K
  • Politics 




Note, too, how Musk is co-opting (if possible) the Q-Anon strategy of using real (and then embellished and ultimately fabricated in the Q space) child sexual abuse and trafficking to recruit people to a far right cause. Convince people that they are fighting against child-raping lizard people and convince them their own government is hiding/running the evil cover-up and abuse, then they believe any other conspiracy you post and you direct them against whatever political target you choose.

The 2022 national report on these “rape gangs” and child sex groomers was full of a lot of horrific details. Stuff that should be prevented and if not prevented harshly punished. But Musk is turning a dispute about jurisdiction over an investigation into a claim of unwillingness to investigate, then tying it to a far far right anti-immigrant provocateur who intentionally and repeatedly spread lies about a particular immigrant despite losing court cases etc. — a guy so rotten that even Farrage wants to keep his distance.

It is gross exploitation of a serious issue that requires serious government response for political chaos aimed at positioning pols he can control in power in another country (having already bought a spot in the upper echelon of the Trump Administration).

And Musk is similarly promoting a far right neo-Nazi party in German elections.

He is publicly announced member of the incoming administration, attacked at the hip to Trump and absolutely out of control. He should lose any security clearance he has, but of course he owns Trump who will restore and like expand his clearance.
 
Last edited:
Within just a few years, the richest man on the planet went from an apparent techno-humanistic-environmentalistic-mental health and free speech advocate to an outright white supremacist, rage bait troll, with a publicly spiraling erratic mental state and a comically (acknowledging the damage isn’t comical) absurd sense of self importance.

Billionaires shouldn’t exist, for more than just the rank and inherent inequities.
 
If in the year 2000, you had a bet that in 25 years that a South African would be on the cusp of bossing multiple governments globally by way of social media pressure, thereby coercing governments in some of the most powerful countries on the planet to do his bidding, you might be as rich as Elon is.


Whoever said he was becoming a super-villain on this post isn't that far off. How the heck is our government going to say no to him?
 
DougDaBroadcasta said:
If in the year 2000, you had a bet that in 25 years that a South African would be on the cusp of bossing multiple governments globally by way of social media pressure, thereby coercing governments in some of the most powerful countries on the planet to do his bidding, you might be as rich as Elon is.


Whoever said he was becoming a super-villain on this post isn't that far off. How the heck is our government going to say no to him?
Click to expand...
Nobody is going to push back on him. Nobody has the power to do so.
 
Last edited:
DougDaBroadcasta said:
If in the year 2000, you had a bet that in 25 years that a South African would be on the cusp of bossing multiple governments globally by way of social media pressure, thereby coercing governments in some of the most powerful countries on the planet to do his bidding, you might be as rich as Elon is.


Whoever said he was becoming a super-villain on this post isn't that far off. How the heck is our government going to say no to him?
Click to expand...
Having been empowered to do so by the American proletariat. That’s what’s most stunning to me.
 
nycfan said:
For emphasis from his notes:

IMG_4422.jpeg
Click to expand...
Which helps solve part of the riddle — why did a military explosives expert use such amateur pyrotechnics that were unlikely to cause much collateral damage? Because he knew what he was doing and intended only a spectacular self-immolation. Not because there is something special about the design of Cybertrucks but because he used the vehicle to make a statement in his own suicide (though maybe Musk & Tesla can run an ad now that Cybertrucks are the safest vehicle for self-immolation suicide?).
 
DougDaBroadcasta said:
If in the year 2000, you had a bet that in 25 years that a South African would be on the cusp of bossing multiple governments globally by way of social media pressure, thereby coercing governments in some of the most powerful countries on the planet to do his bidding, you might be as rich as Elon is.


Whoever said he was becoming a super-villain on this post isn't that far off. How the heck is our government going to say no to him?
Click to expand...
I would ask what social media is
 
For the record, I called this way back at the beginning. I said the driver was probably self-immolating to make a point, like the climate change protester who lit himself on fire.

Also for the record, the worst thing I've done with manic anger is punch a wall. Never even thought of going out with such a big bang. So get off my case, if there are any on it.
 
wmheel1287 said:
Nobody is going to push back on him. Nobody has the power to do so.
Click to expand...
Lots of people have the power to do so. It's just a question of will.

Europe could wreck Musk by banning Tesla and Twitter. He'll eat the loss on Twitter but he will look a lot less invincible, and Tesla is a stock that can plunge very easily. It isn't built on fundamentals at all. And Europe could easily ban Tesla and Twitter if the political will was there.
 
superrific said:
Lots of people have the power to do so. It's just a question of will.

Europe could wreck Musk by banning Tesla and Twitter. He'll eat the loss on Twitter but he will look a lot less invincible, and Tesla is a stock that can plunge very easily. It isn't built on fundamentals at all. And Europe could easily ban Tesla and Twitter if the political will was there.
Click to expand...
All we would need to do is use the government's power to pass laws and enforce regulations to crush any individual who the ruling party doesn't agree with. I can't see any downsides.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
All we would need to do is use the government's power to pass laws and enforce regulations to crush any individual who the ruling party doesn't agree with. I can't see any downsides.
Click to expand...
WTF is wrong with you? This isn't about disagreement. It's about lies. And flouting of the law in multiple dimensions. And cooperation with sanctioned countries and other state-level enemies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top