Trump orders troops to “War ravaged” PORTLAND

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 440
  • Views: 12K
  • Politics 


“… A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold a judge's order that had blocked the deployment while a legal challenge to Trump's action plays out.

… The unsigned majority opinion was joined by Circuit Judge Bridget Bade and Circuit Judge Ryan Nelson, who were both appointed by Trump in his first term. Nelson also wrote a concurring opinion saying courts have no ability to even review the president's decision to send troops.

… Circuit Judge Susan Graber, an appointee of Democratic President Bill Clinton, dissented. She said allowing troops to be called in response to "merely inconvenient" protests was "not merely absurd" but dangerous, and she said the full 9th Circuit should overturn the ruling before Trump has a chance to send troops.

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield also called for a reconsideration by the 9th Circuit, saying the ruling puts America on a "dangerous path."…”
 
nycfan said:


“… A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold a judge's order that had blocked the deployment while a legal challenge to Trump's action plays out.

… The unsigned majority opinion was joined by Circuit Judge Bridget Bade and Circuit Judge Ryan Nelson, who were both appointed by Trump in his first term. Nelson also wrote a concurring opinion saying courts have no ability to even review the president's decision to send troops.

… Circuit Judge Susan Graber, an appointee of Democratic President Bill Clinton, dissented. She said allowing troops to be called in response to "merely inconvenient" protests was "not merely absurd" but dangerous, and she said the full 9th Circuit should overturn the ruling before Trump has a chance to send troops.

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield also called for a reconsideration by the 9th Circuit, saying the ruling puts America on a "dangerous path."…”
Click to expand...

“… In assessing Trump's determination in September that the protests had created an "inability" to enforce federal law in Portland, the 9th Circuit judges split on what evidence should be considered.

The majority looked at evidence from June, when more active protests caused the ICE headquarters in Portland to shut down for three weeks, as well as unrelated events including a shooting at an ICE facility in Dallas.…”
 
nycfan said:
“… In assessing Trump's determination in September that the protests had created an "inability" to enforce federal law in Portland, the 9th Circuit judges split on what evidence should be considered.

The majority looked at evidence from June, when more active protests caused the ICE headquarters in Portland to shut down for three weeks, as well as unrelated events including a shooting at an ICE facility in Dallas.…”
Click to expand...
I can't imagine they'd have a hard time quashing a search warrant that was using probable cause from 4 months earlier.

The Federalist Society is an absolute joke.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top