Trump Retribution Phase | COMEY INDICTED

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 931
  • Views: 29K
  • Politics 



“… "Agents were sent into a crowd control mission after the riot was declared by Metro Police – something that goes against FBI standards," Patel told Fox News Digital. "This was the failure of a corrupt leadership that lied to Congress and to the American people about what really happened."

He added, "Thanks to agents coming forward, we are now uncovering the truth. We are fully committed to transparency, and justice and accountability continues with this FBI."

There’s no indication any FBI agents were involved in any events related to Trump’s speech on the morning of Jan. 6 at the Ellipse, an FBI official told Fox News Digital, adding that Wray should have disclosed that agents were there when he was asked by congressional leaders….

… Wray told a House Committee on Nov. 15, 2023, "If you are asking if the violence at the Capitol was part of some operation orchestrated by FBI sources or agents, the answer is no," but he wouldn’t disclose if any agents or sources were embedded within the crowd.

The 274 agents also includes those who were responding to the pipe bombs placed near the Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee headquarters the night before Jan. 6, according to Politico.…”

Patel also “clarifies” earlier claims that Wray lied with Wray gave a “D.C. answer”
 
Last edited:

Turning Powerful Post 9-11 Counterterrorism Tools Onto Domestic Policy Targets​

A Sweeping National Security Memorandum Transforms the Risk Landscape for U.S. Tax-Exempt Organizations and Their Funders​



“…
On September 25, 2025, President Trump issued National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7 or the Presidential Memorandum), “Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence.”

The Presidential Memorandum has direct and immediate implications for tax-exempt organizations (including charities, advocacy groups, and political organizations) who the government perceives as espousing “anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christian [views]; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; [or] hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality.

The implications extend to the funders and supporters of such organizations. The Presidential Memorandum maintains that the above-listed beliefs have “animat[ed]” political violence, and it seeks to create a government-wide effort to “investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence.” Because the Presidential Memorandum calls for criminal investigations and other legal consequences based on beliefs expressed by organizations and their affiliates, the memorandum — and especially subsequent agency actions to implement its directives — presents significant issues under the First Amendment.…”
 

Turning Powerful Post 9-11 Counterterrorism Tools Onto Domestic Policy Targets​

A Sweeping National Security Memorandum Transforms the Risk Landscape for U.S. Tax-Exempt Organizations and Their Funders​



“…
On September 25, 2025, President Trump issued National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7 or the Presidential Memorandum), “Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence.”

The Presidential Memorandum has direct and immediate implications for tax-exempt organizations (including charities, advocacy groups, and political organizations) who the government perceives as espousing “anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christian [views]; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; [or] hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality.

The implications extend to the funders and supporters of such organizations. The Presidential Memorandum maintains that the above-listed beliefs have “animat[ed]” political violence, and it seeks to create a government-wide effort to “investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence.” Because the Presidential Memorandum calls for criminal investigations and other legal consequences based on beliefs expressed by organizations and their affiliates, the memorandum — and especially subsequent agency actions to implement its directives — presents significant issues under the First Amendment.…”
“… NSPM-7 describes an “anti-fascist lie” comprising “organized campaigns of targeted intimidation, radicalization, threats, and violence designed to silence opposing speech, limit political activity, change or direct policy outcomes, and prevent the functioning of a democratic society,” including:

  • Doxing, swatting, and coordinated harassment campaigns
  • Organized civil disorder and riot-related activity
The breadth of this definition means organizations engaged in protest support, civil rights advocacy, or politically sensitive work may face scrutiny, if their activities are characterized as enabling or motivating such acts.

Empowers the National Joint Terrorism Task Force (NJTTF) and Joint Terrorism Task Forces With New Domestic Focus​


… JTTFs are instructed to target not only organizations that it decides are domestic terrorist organizations, but also individuals who are funders, officers, or employees of other organizations who “aid and abet” the “principal” organizations’ activities.

The exact contours of this directive remain uncertain, but its apparent breadth raises serious legal questions for organizations, funders, and employees. The First Amendment issues, for example, appear significant. It remains to be seen how the JTTFs — and ultimately the courts — will resolve such issues.

… The Presidential Memorandum appears to direct Treasury to write new guidelines for financial institutions on the circumstances in which they must file a SAR that could relate to domestic terrorism.

… While the IRS already has the authority to revoke or deny the tax-exempt status of nonprofit organizations based on substantial illegal activity or violations of well-established public policy, the IRS has exercised its authority only in rare cases, such as when the illegal conduct constituted the primary activity or purpose of the organization.

This directive also raises implications under Section 501(p) of the Internal Revenue Code, which provides for the automatic suspension of an organization’s tax-exempt status when an organization is designated as a terrorist organization or as supporting terrorist activity under one of several enumerated legal mechanisms.…”
 
Back
Top